UNLABELLED: Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a frequent finding in patients with a severe head injury. High intracranial pressure (ICP) has been associated with certain computerized tomography (CT) abnormalities. The classification proposed by Marshall et al. based on CT scan findings, uses the status of the mesencephalic cisterns, the degree of midline shift, and the presence or absence of focal lesions to categorize the patients into different prognostic groups. Our aim in this study was to analyze the ICP evolution pattern in the different groups of lesions of this classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the results of a prospective study in 94 patients with severe head injury, in whom ICP was monitored for at least 6 hours. ICP evolution was classified into three different categories: 1) ICP always < 20 mm Hg, 2) Intracranial hypertension at some time during monitoring, but controlled by medical or surgical treatment, 3) Uncontrollable ICP. The ICP pattern was correlated with the final CT diagnostic category. CONCLUSIONS: 3 patients had a normal CT scan, and none of them presented intracranial hypertension. In diffuse injury type II, the ICP evolution may be quite different. Patients with bilateral brain swelling (Diffuse Injury III) have a high risk of increased ICP (63.2%). Although in our study the frequency of Diffuse Injury IV was low, all patients in this category had a refractory ICP. In the category of evacuated mass lesions, two thirds of the patients presented an intracranial hypertension. In one third, ICP was refractory to treatment. 85% of patients with a non-evacuated mass lesion showed an increased ICP.
UNLABELLED: Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a frequent finding in patients with a severe head injury. High intracranial pressure (ICP) has been associated with certain computerized tomography (CT) abnormalities. The classification proposed by Marshall et al. based on CT scan findings, uses the status of the mesencephalic cisterns, the degree of midline shift, and the presence or absence of focal lesions to categorize the patients into different prognostic groups. Our aim in this study was to analyze the ICP evolution pattern in the different groups of lesions of this classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present the results of a prospective study in 94 patients with severe head injury, in whom ICP was monitored for at least 6 hours. ICP evolution was classified into three different categories: 1) ICP always < 20 mm Hg, 2) Intracranial hypertension at some time during monitoring, but controlled by medical or surgical treatment, 3) Uncontrollable ICP. The ICP pattern was correlated with the final CT diagnostic category. CONCLUSIONS: 3 patients had a normal CT scan, and none of them presented intracranial hypertension. In diffuse injury type II, the ICP evolution may be quite different. Patients with bilateral brain swelling (Diffuse Injury III) have a high risk of increased ICP (63.2%). Although in our study the frequency of Diffuse Injury IV was low, all patients in this category had a refractory ICP. In the category of evacuated mass lesions, two thirds of the patients presented an intracranial hypertension. In one third, ICP was refractory to treatment. 85% of patients with a non-evacuated mass lesion showed an increased ICP.
Authors: Daniel Agustín Godoy; Andrés Rubiano; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Ross Bullock; Juan Sahuquillo Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.210