Literature DB >> 9779078

New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project.

R Hickel, W Dasch, R Janda, M Tyas, K Anusavice.   

Abstract

People worldwide have become increasingly aware of the potential adverse effects on the environment, of pollution control and of toxic effects of food, drugs and biomaterials. Amalgam and its potential toxic side effects (still scientifically unproven) continue to be discussed with increasing controversy by the media in some countries. Consequently, new direct restorative materials are now being explored by dentists, materials scientists and patients who are searching for the so-called 'amalgam substitute' or 'amalgam alternative'. From a critical point of view some of the new direct restorative materials are good with respect to aesthetics, but all material characteristics must be considered, such as mechanical properties, biological effects, and longterm clinical behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779078     DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.1998.tb00688.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  24 in total

1.  One-year evaluation of an Ormocer restorative-a multipractice clinical trial.

Authors:  Michael Rosin; Heike Steffen; Corinna Konschake; Uwe Greese; Dirk Teichmann; Axel Hartmann; Georg Meyer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials.

Authors:  Ulrich Lohbauer; Roland Frankenberger; Norbert Krämer; Anselm Petschelt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants.

Authors:  Y Yilmaz; N Beldüz; O Eyüboglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04

4.  Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material.

Authors:  J F Schirrmeister; K Huber; E Hellwig; P Hahn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Dental resin materials in vivo - TEM results after one year: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gerhard Gröger; Martin Rosentritt; Michael Behr; Josef Schröder; Gerhard Handel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives.

Authors:  A S Al-Hiyasat; H Darmani; M M Milhem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Evaluation of the mechanical properties of dental adhesives and glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  Elisa Magni; Marco Ferrari; Reinhard Hickel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Streptococcus mitis/human gingival fibroblasts co-culture: the best natural association in answer to the 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate release.

Authors:  Mara Di Giulio; Simonetta D'Ercole; Susi Zara; Amelia Cataldi; Luigina Cellini
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.205

10.  Evaluation of fracture resistance and mode of failure of premolars restored with nanohybrid composite, ORMOCER and ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Mohit K Gunwal; Pratima R Shenoi; Tanvee Paranjape; Sonal Dhote; Ravish Tongya; Magesh Kumar; Sanjay Rastogi
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.