Literature DB >> 9778675

Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer.

C E Cox1, F Haddad, S Bass, J M Cox, N N Ku, C Berman, A R Shons, T Yeatman, S Pendas, D S Reintgen.   

Abstract

Developed initially for the treatment of malignant melanoma, lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy have recently been introduced into the treatment of early breast cancer. In breast cancer patients, harvested sentinel lymph nodes are evaluated more thoroughly by detailed pathologic examination using serial sectioning, immunohistochemistry, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques. This allows for the detection of smaller tumor volumes and leads to more accurate staging. Lymphatic mapping has a 68% to 98% success rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node. The false-negative rate (defined as a negative sentinel lymph node while a higher node or nodes in the axilla are positive) is between 0% and 2%. The morbidity associated with this procedure is minimal. We believe that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy will ultimately lead to more conservative treatment of patients with breast cancer. This article describes the historical background and technical aspects of the procedure. This is followed by updated, prospectively collected outcomes data from 466 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent lymphatic mapping at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, as well as an up-to-date review of the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9778675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  8 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Methylene Blue Dye Alone Versus Combination of Methylene Blue Dye and Radioactive Sulfur Colloid in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Kvvn Raju; T Subramanyeshwar Rao; C K Naidu; Vipin Goel; Nisha Hariharan; Ramachandra Nagarajuch; B Madhunarayana
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10

2.  Predictors for nonsentinel node involvement in breast cancer patients with micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node.

Authors:  Archana Ganaraj; Joseph A Kuhn; Ronald C Jones; Michael D Grant; Valerie R Andrews; Sally M Knox; Georges J Netto; Basel Altrabulsi; Sheryl A Livingston; Todd M McCarty
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: window to management of the axilla.

Authors:  Ashwini Kumar; Ruchir Puri; Pranjali V Gadgil; Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging on important outcomes among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Beth A Virnig; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer does not improve the ability to identify axillary sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  K M McMasters; S L Wong; T M Tuttle; D J Carlson; C M Brown; R Dirk Noyes; R L Glaser; D J Vennekotter; P S Turk; P S Tate; A Sardi; M J Edwards
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with breast cancer: five-year experience.

Authors:  Richard S Godfrey; Dennis R Holmes; Anjali S Kumar; Susan E Kutner
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

7.  Practice patterns in breast cancer surgery: Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Porter; Heather McMulkin-Tait
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Invalidity of SUV Measurements of Lesions in Close Proximity to Hot Sources due to "Shine-Through" Effect on FDG PET-CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Yiyan Liu
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.