Literature DB >> 9778331

Atrioverter: an implantable device for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

H J Wellens1, C P Lau, B Lüderitz, M Akhtar, A L Waldo, A J Camm, C Timmermans, H F Tse, W Jung, L Jordaens, G Ayers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During atrial fibrillation, electrophysiological changes occur in atrial tissue that favor the maintenance of the arrhythmia and facilitate recurrence after conversion to sinus rhythm. An implantable defibrillator connected to right atrial and coronary sinus defibrillation leads allows prompt restoration of sinus rhythm by a low-energy shock. The safety and efficacy of this system, called the Atrioverter, were evaluated in a prospective, multicenter study. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study included 51 patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation who had not responded to antiarrhythmic drugs, were in New York Heart Association Heart failure class I or II, and were at low risk for ventricular arrhythmias. The atrial defibrillation threshold had to be </=240 V during preimplant testing. Atrial fibrillation detection, R-wave shock synchronization, and defibrillation threshold were tested at implantation and during follow-up. Shock termination of spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation was performed under physician observation. Results are given after a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. During a follow-up of 72 to 613 days (mean, 259+/-138 days), 96% of 227 spontaneous episodes of atrial fibrillation in 41 patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm by the Atrioverter. In 27% of episodes, several shocks were required because of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Shocks did not induce ventricular arrhythmias. Most patients received antiarrhythmic medication during follow-up. In 4 patients, the Atrioverter was removed: in 1 because of infection, in 1 because of cardiac tamponade, and in 1 because of frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation requiring His bundle ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: With the Atrioverter, prompt and safe restoration of sinus rhythm is possible in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9778331     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.16.1651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  46 in total

Review 1.  Changing concepts of electrophysiology testing for ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  M Akhtar
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  New devices and hybrid therapies and new devices for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R B Krol; S Saksena; A Prakash
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Electrophysiologic study in patients with atrial fibrillation: an idea whose time has come yet again.

Authors:  S Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Atrial defibrillation at the millennium: new challenges for evolving technology.

Authors:  R Boccadamo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Images in cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Henrik Joan Joost Wellens.

Authors:  B Lüderitz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Report of the NASPE/NHLBI Round Table on Future Research Directions in Atrial Fibrillation. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  S Saskena; M J Domanski; E J Benjamin; A J Camm; M D Ezekowitz; B J Gersh; J Jalife; G V Naccarelli; R E Vlietstra; D G Wyse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Optimizing atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  A Prakash; S Saksena
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Arrhythmias in Heart Failure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-08

Review 9.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Y Blaauw; I C Van Gelder; H J G M Crijns
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Should all implantable cardioverter defibrillators for ventricular arrhythmias be dual-chamber devices?

Authors:  K L Lee; C P Lau
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.