Literature DB >> 11096538

Arrhythmias in Heart Failure.

.   

Abstract

Cardiac arrhythmias are very common in the setting of heart failure, with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias often present in the same patient. The risk and the benefit of antiarrhythmic therapies are still a matter of debate. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided in patients with heart failure, cardiac ischemia, or previous myocardial infarction. Beta-blocker agents reduce morbidity and decrease mortality in patients suffering from moderate to severe heart failure. Amiodarone may be beneficial in patients with advanced heart failure and increased resting heart rates. This class III drug may be effective to suppress episodes of atrial fibrillation but can also be beneficial in reducing ventricular response by slowing atrioventricular conduction during chronic atrial fibrillation. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) markedly reduce sudden cardiac death in patients with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. In patients with advanced heart failure, however, the ICD may not markedly extend survival. Recently analyzed data from the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS), Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) registry, Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), and Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) have consistently shown that it is the sickest patient who benefits the most from ICD therapy. Patients with markedly depressed ejection fraction (<30%), poor New York Heart Association functional class, and advanced age have been identified as those who really need ICD therapy. Studies of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with moderate to severe heart failure have been launched and will provide necessary answers to the question of whether a reduction in sudden death will translate into a reduction of all-cause mortality. For patients resuscitated from sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, an ICD or, in some cases, amiodarone should be considered. Catheter or surgical ablation can be considered for selected patients with ventricular tachycardia.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11096538     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-996-0007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  32 in total

1.  Guidelines for Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiological and Catheter Ablation Procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. (Committee on Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiologic and Catheter Ablation Procedures). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Congestive heart failure induced by six of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  S Ravid; P J Podrid; S Lampert; B Lown
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

Authors:  S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Identification of patients most likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.

Authors:  R Sheldon; S Connolly; A Krahn; R Roberts; M Gent; M Gardner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators.

Authors:  J W Mason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Influence of the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator on sudden death and total mortality in patients evaluated for cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  M O Sweeney; J N Ruskin; H Garan; B A McGovern; M L Guy; D F Torchiana; G J Vlahakes; J B Newell; M J Semigran; G W Dec
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Randomised trial of low-dose amiodarone in severe congestive heart failure. Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina (GESICA)

Authors:  H C Doval; D R Nul; H O Grancelli; S V Perrone; G R Bortman; R Curiel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F Morady; M Harvey; S J Kalbfleisch; R el-Atassi; H Calkins; J J Langberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Patient selection criteria and results of surgery for refractory ischemic ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  J L Cox
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Propagation of pacemaker activity.

Authors:  Ronald W Joyner; Ronald Wilders; Mary B Wagner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 2.602

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.