Literature DB >> 9778174

Trends of back pain in eastern Finland, 1972-1992, in relation to socioeconomic status and behavioral risk factors.

S Heistaro1, E Vartiainen, M Heliövaara, P Puska.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the trends in the prevalence of back pain between several population subgroups and to assess the stability of the associations between back pain and its potential risk factors. Five cross-sectional surveys with independent random samples were conducted in two provinces in eastern Finland every fifth year from 1972 to 1992. There were 29,043 respondents aged 30-59 years. The respondents completed a questionnaire that asked about the occurrence of back pain during the preceding month. The prevalence of back pain varied between 46 and 50 percent among men and between 46 and 51 percent among women. In general, the trend for the entire sample was fairly stable, but the prevalence rates seemed to differ considerably between subgroups of the population. Back pain was more prevalent among those with lower education and income, those with blue-collar occupations, and those doing heavy work. The trends were significantly inconsistent (p < 0.05), for example, between the categories according to household income and, among men, between the categories according to body mass index, a suspected risk factor for back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9778174     DOI: 10.1093/aje/148.7.671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  14 in total

1.  Socioeconomic differences in severe back morbidity.

Authors:  L Punnett
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Socioeconomic position and low-back pain--the role of biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors in the GAZEL cohort.

Authors:  Sandrine Plouvier; Annette Leclerc; Jean-François Chastang; Sébastien Bonenfant; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  [Back pain and social status among the working population: what is the association? Results from a German general population survey].

Authors:  C O Schmidt; J Moock; R A Fahland; Y Y-S Feng; T Kohlmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern; Chi Chiao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Formal education and back pain: a review.

Authors:  C E Dionne; M Von Korff; T D Koepsell; R A Deyo; W E Barlow; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Chronic widespread pain and fibromyalgia: Should reports of increased mortality influence management?

Authors:  Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Workplace stress, lifestyle and social factors as correlates of back pain: a representative study of the German working population.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Holger Schmitt; Silke Zoller; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Prevalence of somatoform pain complaints in the German population.

Authors:  Aike Hessel; Manfred Beutel; Michael Geyer; Jörg Schumacher; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2005-03-21

9.  The rising prevalence of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; George M Holmes; Robert P Agans; Anne M Jackman; Jane D Darter; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; William D Kalsbeek; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-09

10.  How consistently distributed are the socioeconomic differences in severe back morbidity by age and gender? A population based study of hospitalisation among Finnish employees.

Authors:  L Kaila-Kangas; I Keskimäki; V Notkola; P Mutanen; H Riihimäki; P Leino-Arjas
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.