OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role that biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors play in occupational class disparities in low-back pain in the GAZEL cohort. METHODS: Recruited in 1989, the GAZEL cohort members were employees of the French national company in charge of energy who volunteered to enroll in an annual follow-up survey. The study population comprised 1487 men who completed questionnaires in 1996 (past occupational exposure to manual material handling, bending/twisting, and driving), 1997 (psychosocial work factors), and 2001 (low-back pain using a French version of the Nordic questionnaire for the assessment of low-back pain). Associations between low-back pain for >30 days in the preceding 12 months and social position at baseline (four categories) were described with a Cox model to determine prevalence ratios for each category. We compared adjusted and unadjusted ratios to quantify the contribution of occupational exposures. RESULTS: The prevalence of low-back pain for >30 days was 13.6%. The prevalence of low-back pain adjusted for age was significantly higher for blue-collar workers and clerks than for managers. The number of socioeconomic disparities observed was significantly reduced when biomechanical strains were taken into account; adjusting for psychosocial factors had little impact. CONCLUSION: In this population, occupational exposures--especially biomechanical strains--played an important role in occupational class disparities for persistent or recurrent low-back pain.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role that biomechanical strains and psychosocial work factors play in occupational class disparities in low-back pain in the GAZEL cohort. METHODS: Recruited in 1989, the GAZEL cohort members were employees of the French national company in charge of energy who volunteered to enroll in an annual follow-up survey. The study population comprised 1487 men who completed questionnaires in 1996 (past occupational exposure to manual material handling, bending/twisting, and driving), 1997 (psychosocial work factors), and 2001 (low-back pain using a French version of the Nordic questionnaire for the assessment of low-back pain). Associations between low-back pain for >30 days in the preceding 12 months and social position at baseline (four categories) were described with a Cox model to determine prevalence ratios for each category. We compared adjusted and unadjusted ratios to quantify the contribution of occupational exposures. RESULTS: The prevalence of low-back pain for >30 days was 13.6%. The prevalence of low-back pain adjusted for age was significantly higher for blue-collar workers and clerks than for managers. The number of socioeconomic disparities observed was significantly reduced when biomechanical strains were taken into account; adjusting for psychosocial factors had little impact. CONCLUSION: In this population, occupational exposures--especially biomechanical strains--played an important role in occupational class disparities for persistent or recurrent low-back pain.
Authors: W E Hoogendoorn; P M Bongers; H C de Vet; M Douwes; B W Koes; M C Miedema; G A Ariëns; L M Bouter Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: M Melchior; Y Roquelaure; B Evanoff; J-F Chastang; C Ha; E Imbernon; M Goldberg; A Leclerc Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Loretta G Platts; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Elizabeth Webb; Marie Zins; Marcel Goldberg; David Blane; Morten Wahrendorf Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2013-04-05 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Jennifer Stewart Williams; Nawi Ng; Karl Peltzer; Alfred Yawson; Richard Biritwum; Tamara Maximova; Fan Wu; Perianayagam Arokiasamy; Paul Kowal; Somnath Chatterji Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthias Claus; Michael Schuster; Stefan Webendörfer; David A Groneberg; Jacqueline Jähner; Daniel Schiffmann Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Charlotte Brauer; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Ellen Bøtker Pedersen; Karina Lauenborg Møller; Erik Bruun Simonsen; Henrik Koblauch; Tine Alkjær; Karin Helweg-Larsen; Lau Caspar Thygesen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 3.015