Literature DB >> 9777525

Ultrasound instruments as possible vectors of staphylococcal infection.

T Ohara1, Y Itoh, K Itoh.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether ultrasound instruments are important in the spread of nosocomial staphylococcal infections. Following genomic typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, it was apparent that ultrasound procedures transferred colonizing staphylococci from a patient's skin to the ultrasound instruments. Staphylococcus aureus survived in the transmission medium for longer than in water. Furthermore, S. aureus was more resistant to the ultrasonic medium than Pseudomonas aeruginosa, also a significant cause of hospital-acquired infections. To prevent staphylococcal transmission by ultrasound equipment, we recommend disinfection of the probe and removal of the medium after each examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777525     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90028-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

Review 1.  MRSA and the environment: implications for comprehensive control measures.

Authors:  N Cimolai
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Genotyping of clinical methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Dutch teaching hospital.

Authors:  Yvonne Van Dijk; Camiel L C Wielders; Ad C Fluit; Armand Paauw; Rob J A Diepersloot; Ellen M Mascini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Superiority of chlorhexidine 2%/alcohol 70% wipes in decontaminating ultrasound equipment.

Authors:  Bhavin Shukla; Victoria Howell; Alicia Griffiths; Anita Thoppil; Monica Liu; Joseph Carter; Peter Young
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04-01

4.  Evaluation of procedures for decontaminating ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Shunji Hayashi; Harumi Koibuchi; Nobuyuki Taniguchi; Yoshikazu Hirai
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Comparison of methods for evaluating bacterial contamination of ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Harumi Koibuchi; Shunji Hayashi; Kazuhiko Kotani; Yasutomo Fujii; Kei Konno; Yoshikazu Hirai; Nobuyuki Taniguchi
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Indirect ultrasound guidance increased accuracy of the glenohumeral injection using the superior approach: a cadaveric study of injection accuracy.

Authors:  Joon Sung Kim; Min-Wook Kim; Dong Yoon Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 7.  Clinical review: Bedside lung ultrasound in critical care practice.

Authors:  Bélaïd Bouhemad; Mao Zhang; Qin Lu; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Persistence of microbial contamination on transvaginal ultrasound probes despite low-level disinfection procedure.

Authors:  Fatima M'Zali; Carole Bounizra; Sandrine Leroy; Yahia Mekki; Claudine Quentin-Noury; Michael Kann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Emergency department ultrasound probe infection control: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Hamid Shokoohi; Paige Armstrong; Ryan Tansek
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2015-01-05

Review 10.  Ultrasound scan as a potential source of nosocomial and crossinfection: a literature review.

Authors:  André Hadyme Miyague; Fernando Marum Mauad; Wellington de Paula Martins; Augusto César Garcia Benedetti; Ana Elizabeth Gomes de Melo Tavares Ferreira; Francisco Mauad-Filho
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.