Literature DB >> 27433210

Superiority of chlorhexidine 2%/alcohol 70% wipes in decontaminating ultrasound equipment.

Bhavin Shukla1, Victoria Howell1, Alicia Griffiths1, Anita Thoppil1, Monica Liu1, Joseph Carter2, Peter Young1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound equipment is known to act as a reservoir for potentially pathogenic organisms. The aims of these studies were to establish current cleaning practices, to review the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment in our hospital, to establish an effective cleaning regimen and to ensure that cleaning does not cause damage. A questionnaire was sent to all acute NHS hospitals in England to establish current cleaning practices. A review of our current practice was performed to establish the extent of bacterial contamination of ultrasound equipment currently in use. Laboratory studies compared cleaning the probes with soap and water with decontaminating with a chlorhexidine 2% and alcohol 70% wipe, including quantifying the residual effect. Accelerated aging was performed on the probe and staff surveyed to establish potential problems with using the wipes on the probe. The survey revealed that a variety of cleaning methods were used to decontaminate ultrasound probes; 57% of our ultrasound machines were contaminated with bacteria. The laboratory studies showed superiority of the chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes over soap and water due to a residual effect, both immediately after cleaning and after 24 hours. The staff survey demonstrated no apparent change in function of the probe after cleaning with the chlorhexidine wipes. Cleaning ultrasound probes with chlorhexidine and alcohol wipes is effective and provides additional protection against bacterial contamination due to its residual effect, and appears in the short term to have no detrimental effect on the probe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound; anaesthesia; chlorhexidine; decontamination; infection control

Year:  2014        PMID: 27433210      PMCID: PMC4760535          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X14529761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  18 in total

1.  US probes: risk of cross infection and ways to reduce it--comparison of cleaning methods.

Authors:  C Fowler; D McCracken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  An outbreak of pyodermas among neonates caused by ultrasound gel contaminated with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Weist; C Wendt; L R Petersen; H Versmold; H Rüden
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Evaluation of the role of ultrasound machines as a source of nosocomial and cross-infection.

Authors:  Y M Karadenz; D Kiliç; S Kara Altan; D Altinok; S Güney
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Ultrasound and the risk of nosocomial cross infection.

Authors:  B Sahu; N Raine-Fenning
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  [Ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia: an effective method for cleaning the probes].

Authors:  S Bloc; T Garnier; C Bounhiol; B Komly; G Machado; P Leclerc; M Roy; L Mercadal; V Demontoux; B Morel; C Ecoffey; G Dhonneur
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  2008-11-20

6.  Emergency department ultrasound infection control: do unto (and into) others.

Authors:  David A Talan; Carmen N Partida
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Are therapeutic ultrasound units a potential vector for nosocomial infection?

Authors:  Siobhan Schabrun; Lucy Chipchase; Heather Rickard
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2006-06

8.  Cleaning methods for ultrasound probes.

Authors:  Waseem Akhtar Mirza; Syed Hadi Imam; Mohd Salim Ahmed Kharal; Mubashir Aslam; Syed Arif Ali; I Masroor; M Nadeem Ahmad
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.711

9.  Contamination of equipment in emergency settings: an exploratory study with a targeted automated intervention.

Authors:  Chidi Obasi; Allison Agwu; Wale Akinpelu; Roger Hammons; Clyde Clark; Ralph Etienne-cummings; Peter Hill; Richard Rothman; Stella Babalola; Tracy Ross; Karen Carroll; Bolanle Asiyanbola
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-07-30

10.  Infection control in anaesthesia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surgical Loupes Worn by Orthopaedic Surgeons Are a Reservoir for Microorganisms.

Authors:  Jack G Graham; Antonia F Chen; Noreen J Hickok; Samantha Knott; Caroline Purtill; Dennis Martin; Pedro K Beredjiklian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Combatting COVID-19: is ultrasound an important piece in the diagnostic puzzle?

Authors:  Cian McDermott; Joseph Daly; Simon Carley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.740

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.