Literature DB >> 9776459

Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

S Sauerland1, R Lefering, U Holthausen, E A Neugebauer.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic and conventional "open" appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials available by May 1998 that compared both techniques. Within each trial and for each outcome an effect size was calculated; the effect sizes were then pooled by a random-effects model.
RESULTS: We summarised outcome data of 2877 patients included in 28 trials. Operating time was +16 min (95% confidence interval +12-20 min) longer for laparoscopic appendectomy. Overall complication rates were comparable, but wound infections were definitely reduced after laparoscopy [rate difference -4.2%, (-2.3% to -6.1%)]. Intra-abdominal abscesses, however, occurred slightly more frequently [+0.9%, (-0.4% to +2.3%)]. Hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy was 15 h (8-23 h) shorter, and patients returned to full fitness or work 7 days (5-9 days) earlier. Pain intensity on day 1 was slightly less. Heterogeneity was present for some outcome measures due to methodological differences among the primary studies.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces wound infections and eases postoperative recovery. Nevertheless, the various differences among the primary studies and their partly flawed methodology make it difficult to generalise from these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9776459     DOI: 10.1007/s004230050135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  45 in total

1.  SAGES Appropriateness Conference: a summary.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; A Fingerhut; J Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons' preference for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai; Shih-Horng Tseng; Yueh-Tsung Lee; Chih-Hung Hsu; Dev-Aur Chou; Hurng-Sheng Wu; Min-Ho Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Heng-Fu Lin; Jiann-Ming Wu; Li-Ming Tseng; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Shih-Horng Huang; I-Rue Lai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic surgery--15 years after clinical introduction.

Authors:  Reinhard Bittner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Fukami; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Eiji Sakamoto; Shunichiro Komatsu; Takashi Hiromatsu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Prophylactic surgery prior to extended-duration space flight: is the benefit worth the risk?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; David R Williams; Jeffrey A Jones; J D Polk; James M Vanderploeg; Mark A Talamini; Mark R Campbell; Timothy J Broderick
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; Erika Fellinger; William Reed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.