Literature DB >> 9776031

Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans.

T B Lovelace1, J T Mellonig, R M Meffert, A A Jones, P V Nummikoski, D L Cochran.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of bioactive glass to demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of human periodontal osseous defects. Fifteen systemically healthy patients (6 males and 9 females, aged 30 to 63) with moderate to advanced adult periodontitis were selected for the study. All patients underwent initial therapy, which included scaling and root planing, oral hygiene instruction, and an occlusal adjustment when indicated, followed by re-evaluation 4 to 6 weeks later. Paired osseous defects in each subject were randomly selected to receive grafts of bioactive glass or DFDBA. Both soft and hard tissue measurements were taken the day of surgery (baseline) and at the 6-month re-entry surgery. The clinical examiner was calibrated and blinded to the surgical procedures, while the surgeon was masked to the clinical measurements. Statistical analysis was performed by using the paired Student's t test. The results indicated that probing depths were reduced by 3.07 +/- 0.80 mm with the bioactive glass and 2.60 +/- 1.40 mm with DFDBA. Sites grafted with bioactive glass resulted in 2.27 +/- 0.88 mm attachment level gain, while sites grafted with DFDBA had a 1.93 +/- 1.33 mm gain in attachment. Bioactive glass sites displayed 0.53 +/- 0.64 mm of crestal resorption and 2.73 mm bone fill. DFDBA-grafted sites experienced 0.80 +/- 0.56 mm of crestal resorption and 2.80 mm defect fill. The use of bioactive glass resulted in 61.8% bone fill and 73.33% defect resolution. DFDBA-grafted defects showed similar results, with 62.5% bone fill and 80.87% defect resolution. Both treatments provided soft and hard tissue improvements when compared to baseline (P < or = 0.0001). No statistical difference was found when comparing bioactive glass to DFDBA; however, studies with larger sample sizes may reveal true differences between the materials. This study suggests that bioactive glass is capable of producing results in the short term (6 months) similar to that of DFDBA when used in moderate to deep intrabony periodontal defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9776031     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  26 in total

1.  The story of Bioglass.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Surface modification of titanium implants using bioactive glasses with air abrasion technologies.

Authors:  Garrit Koller; Richard J Cook; Ian D Thompson; Timothy F Watson; Lucy Di Silvio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Endodontic surgery with and without inserts of bioactive glass PerioGlas--a clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Pantchev; Eva Nohlert; Ake Tegelberg
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-03

4.  Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  WITHDRAWN: Occlusal interventions for periodontitis in adults.

Authors:  Paul Weston; Yuhaniz A Yaziz; David R Moles; Ian Needleman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-28

6.  Bioactive evaluation of 45S5 bioactive glass fibres and preliminary study of human osteoblast attachment.

Authors:  Daniel C Clupper; Julie E Gough; Papy M Embanga; Ioan Notingher; Larry L Hench; Matthew M Hall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Effect of soft laser and bioactive glass on bone regeneration in the treatment of infra-bony defects (a clinical study).

Authors:  Nayer S AboElsaad; Mena Soory; Laila M A Gadalla; Laila I Ragab; Stephen Dunne; Khaled R Zalata; Chris Louca
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Proangiogenic potential of a collagen/bioactive glass substrate.

Authors:  Ann Leu; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Comparative evaluation of bioglass with calcium sulphate β-hemihydrate for the treatment of intraosseous defects-a clinico-radiological study.

Authors:  Vb Mandlik; Subrato Roy; Ak Jha
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-01-18

Review 10.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.