Literature DB >> 9773856

Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients.

S De Geest1, I Abraham, P Moons, M Vandeputte, J Van Cleemput, G Evers, W Daenen, J Vanhaecke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although noncompliance with immunosuppressive medication is recognized as a critical behavioral risk factor for late acute rejection episodes and graft loss after transplantation, little is known about the degree of subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance, its associated risk for acute late rejection episodes (>1 year after transplantation), and its determinants in heart transplant recipients.
METHODS: The convenience sample of this longitudinal study included 101 European heart transplant recipients (87 men and 14 women), with a median age of 56 (Q1 = 50, Q3 = 61) and a median posttransplantation status of 3 (range 1 to 6) years. Subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance was measured during a 3-month period with electronic event monitoring. Selected sociodemographic, behavioral, cognitive, emotional, health, and treatment-related determinants of medication noncompliance were measured by using instruments with established psychometric properties or by patient interviews. With the use of iterative partitioning methods of cluster analysis, including nonstandardized electronic event monitoring compliance parameters, patients were categorized by degree of subclinical cyclosporine noncompliance into a 3-cluster solution.
RESULTS: Overall compliance was high, with a median medication taking compliance of 99.4%. The 3 derived clusters, that is, excellent compliers (84%), minor subclinical noncompliers (7%), and moderate subclinical noncompliers (9%), differed significantly by degree of subclinical noncompliance (p < .0001) and showed a 1.19%, 14.28%, and 22.22% incidence of late acute rejections (p = .01), respectively. The 3 groups also differed in terms of former medication noncompliance (p = .02), appointment noncompliance (p = .03), and perceived self-efficacy with medication taking (p = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Although in absolute numbers cyclosporine compliance in this sample was high, minor deviations from dosing schedule were associated with an increased risk for acute late rejection episodes. This suggests a pivotal role of patient compliance in successful long-term outcome after transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9773856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  36 in total

1.  The odds of the three nons when an aptly prescribed medicine isn't working: non-compliance, non-absorption, non-response.

Authors:  John Urquhart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Taking immunosuppressive medications effectively (TIMELink): a pilot randomized controlled trial in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Cynthia Russell; Vicki Conn; Catherine Ashbaugh; Richard Madsen; Mark Wakefield; Andrew Webb; Deanna Coffey; Leanne Peace
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  Psychosocial aftercare after organ transplantation.

Authors:  Uwe Wutzler; Margit Venner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Transplantation: Increasing adherence to immunosuppression: a clinical priority.

Authors:  Sabina De Geest; Fabienne Dobbels
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Differences in health behaviour between recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic SCT and the general population: a matched control study.

Authors:  M Kirsch; A Götz; J P Halter; U Schanz; G Stussi; F Dobbels; S De Geest
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 6.  Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium: tolerability profile compared with mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Matthias Behrend; Felix Braun
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Measuring patient-reported outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients: an overview of instruments developed to date.

Authors:  Irina Cleemput; Fabienne Dobbels
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Adherence to immunosuppressants: how can it be improved in adolescent organ transplant recipients?

Authors:  Emily M Fredericks; Dawn Dore-Stites
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Frederick R Adler; Paul Aurora; David H Barker; Mark L Barr; Laura S Blackwell; Otto H Bosma; Samuel Brown; D R Cox; Judy L Jensen; Geoffrey Kurland; George D Nossent; Alexandra L Quittner; Walter M Robinson; Sandy L Romero; Helen Spencer; Stuart C Sweet; Wim van der Bij; J Vermeulen; Erik A M Verschuuren; Elianne J L E Vrijlandt; William Walsh; Marlyn S Woo; Theodore G Liou
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-12

10.  Quantitative patterns of azathioprine adherence after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas E Nevins; William Thomas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.