Literature DB >> 3597671

Cotinine validation of self-reported smoking in commercially run community surveys.

J P Pierce, T Dwyer, E DiGiusto, T Carpenter, C Hannam, A Amin, C Yong, G Sarfaty, J Shaw, N Burke.   

Abstract

A validation study was carried out on self-reported smoking for 1177 people in Sydney and Melbourne in 1983. Because of its long half life and the fact that smoking is its only source in body fluids, saliva cotinine was chosen as the validation measure. Cotinine levels above 250 nmol/l were used to classify people as smokers. The sensitivity of self-reported smoking was 92.6% and the specificity was 93.4%. There was some evidence that people in the process of changing their smoking status might be slow in updating their self-classification. The smoking prevalence estimate based on cotinine levels was found to be 1.7% lower than that for self-reported smoking status. The small proportion of false negatives and false positives suggests that commercially collected data banks can be valid sources of prevalence data. Correlation between cotinine level and reported cigarette consumption was not affected by sample volume, and was similar to that achieved for carbon monoxide and thiocyanate at a low 0.34. Regression analysis using self-reported cigarette consumption filter/non-filter cigarettes, and time since last cigarette as predictors, explained 13.6% of the variance in cotinine level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3597671     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90105-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chronic Dis        ISSN: 0021-9681


  30 in total

1.  Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women.

Authors:  N R Boyd; R A Windsor; L L Perkins; J B Lowe
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-06

2.  Cigarette taxes and smoking during pregnancy.

Authors:  J S Ringel; W N Evans
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Mass media-led antismoking campaign can remove the education gap in quitting behavior.

Authors:  P Macaskill; J P Pierce; J M Simpson; D M Lyle
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Occupational risks associated with cigarette smoking: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Ryan; C Zwerling; E J Orav
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Using patients' descriptions of alcohol consumption, diet, medication compliance, and cigarette smoking: the validity of self-reports in research and practice.

Authors:  V J Strecher; M H Becker; N M Clark; P Prasada-Rao
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Misclassification rates for current smokers misclassified as nonsmokers.

Authors:  A J Wells; P B English; S F Posner; L E Wagenknecht; E J Perez-Stable
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Relation between cotinine in the urine and indices based on self-declared smoking habits.

Authors:  Akiko Tsutsumi; Jun Kagawa; Yuko Yamano; Toshio Nakadate; Satoru Shimizu
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  Long-term effectiveness of mass media led antismoking campaigns in Australia.

Authors:  J P Pierce; P Macaskill; D Hill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Changes in age trajectories of smoking experimentation during the California Tobacco Control Program.

Authors:  Karen Messer; John P Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Smoking history, alcohol consumption, and systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-control study.

Authors:  C J Hardy; B P Palmer; K R Muir; A J Sutton; R J Powell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.