Literature DB >> 17931729

Control of velocity and position in single joint movements.

Pratik K Mutha1, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Previous research on single joint movements has lead to the development of models of control that propose that movement speed and distance are controlled through an initial pulsatile signal that can be modified in both amplitude and duration. However, the manner in which the amplitude and duration are modulated during the control of movement remains controversial. We now report two studies that were designed to differentiate the mechanisms used to control movement speed from those employed to control final position accuracy. In our first study, participants move at a series of speeds to a single spatial target. In this task, acceleration duration (pulse-width) varied substantially across speeds, and was negatively correlated with peak acceleration (pulse-height). In a second experiment, we removed the spatial target, but required movements at the three speeds similar to those used in the first study. In this task, acceleration amplitude varied extensively across the speed targets, while acceleration duration remained constant. Taken together, our current findings demonstrate that pulse-width measures can be modulated independently from pulse-height measures, and that a positive correlation between such measures is not obligatory, even when sampled across a range of movement speeds. In addition, our findings suggest that pulse-height modulation plays a primary role in controlling movement speed and specifying target distance, whereas pulse-width mechanisms are employed to correct errors in pulse-height control, as required to achieve spatial precision in final limb position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17931729      PMCID: PMC2607068          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  30 in total

1.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. I. Response latency.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Amplitude- and instruction-dependent modulation of movement-related electromyogram activity in humans.

Authors:  S H Brown; J D Cooke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Responses to force perturbations preceding voluntary human arm movements.

Authors:  S H Brown; J D Cooke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  EMG patterns in antagonist muscles during isometric contraction in man: relations to response dynamics.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer; Vivek Yadav
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke: kinematic differences based on side of brain damage.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Control of reach extent with the paretic and nonparetic arms after unilateral sensorimotor stroke II: planning and adjustments to control movement distance.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage.

Authors:  Kathleen Y Haaland; Sydney Y Schaefer; Robert T Knight; John Adair; Alvaro Magalhaes; Joseph Sadek; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Planning and adjustments for the control of reach extent in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; James Gordon; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Yadav; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of direction and index of difficulty on aiming movements after stroke.

Authors:  Paola Ribeiro Coqueiro; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas; Cassandra Mendes Assunção e Silva; Sandra Regina Alouche
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.342

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.