Literature DB >> 9770653

The effect of head-to-trunk position on the direction of arm movements before, during, and after space flight.

M Berger1, S Lechner-Steinleitner, I Kozlovskaya, G Holzmüller, S Mescheriakov, A Sokolov, F Gerstenbrand.   

Abstract

This contribution deals with the examination of the consequences of different head-to-trunk positions on arm movements under normal gravity and during prolonged space flight. One of the objectives of this study was to investigate the influence of weightlessness on the condition of the spatial analysis system. Aimed arm movements in the horizontal plane (pointings towards two visual targets) were recorded, first with eyes open, head straight (learning part), then with eyes closed, head straight and during yaw or roll position of the head (performance part). Measurements related to these different head-to-trunk-positions were taken in one short-term and nine long-term cosmonauts preflight, inflight, and postflight. Terrestrial control experiments were carried out with an extended experimental design in 14 healthy volunteers. The analysis of these experiments revealed that, with eyes closed and the head in yaw position, cosmonauts before flight and control subjects exhibit significant slants of the movement plane of the arm. Contrary to terrestrial measurements, in space experiments roll tilt of the head to the right is correlated with considerable counterclockwise slant of the movement plane. This slant of the movement plane of the arm was interpreted as tilt of the internal representation of the horizontal coordinate. The effect is larger with greater distortion induced by the changed head position and with larger muscular involvement to keep this position. This effect is also increased by the reduction of information (for example, in microgravity). The amount and the direction of the horizontal offset of the arm movements are shown to be dependent on the head-to-trunk position, too. Additionally, we have found changes in the amplitude and in the duration of the arm movement, in the vertical offset, and in the curvature of the movement paths, depending on the experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9770653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  From head orientation to hand control: evidence of both neck and vestibular involvement in hand drawing.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jean Blouin; Jean-Louis Vercher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changes in head and neck position affect elbow joint position sense.

Authors:  Joanna J Knox; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceived versus actual head-on-trunk orientation during arm movement control.

Authors:  Michel Guerraz; Jordan Navarro; Frédéric Ferrero; Jacques Cremieux; Jean Blouin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Do you know where your arm is if you think your head has moved?

Authors:  Joanna J Knox; Michel W Coppieters; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differences in movement mechanics, electromyographic, and motor cortex activity between accurate and nonaccurate stepping.

Authors:  Irina N Beloozerova; Bradley J Farrell; Mikhail G Sirota; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Does My Neck Make Me Clumsy? A Systematic Review of Clinical and Neurophysiological Studies in Humans.

Authors:  Samantha C Harman; Zhen Zheng; Julie C Kendall; Dein Vindigni; Barbara I Polus
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-10-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.