Literature DB >> 9769823

Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single-section CT.

T R Bader1, A M Herneth, W Blaicher, R Steininger, F Mühlbacher, G Lechner, F Grabenwöger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare hepatic perfusion values after orthotopic liver transplantation with those in healthy volunteers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic single-section computed tomography (CT) of the liver was performed in 50 participants, including 30 study patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation and had no clinical evidence of postoperative complications (mean age, 53.7 years) and 20 healthy volunteers (control subjects) (mean age, 59.0 years). CT scans were obtained at a single level to include the liver, spleen, aorta, and portal vein. Scans were obtained over 88 seconds (one baseline scan followed by 16 scans every 2 seconds and, then, eight scans every 7 seconds) beginning with the injection of 40 mL of contrast agent (flow rate, 10 mL/sec). On each CT scan, the attenuation of these organs was measured in regions of interest to provide time-attenuation curves. From these data, the arterial, portal venous, and total perfusion of the liver were calculated, and the hepatic perfusion index was assessed.
RESULTS: In control subjects and study patients, respectively, mean arterial hepatic perfusion was 0.16 and 0.25 mL/min/mL (P = .001 [two-tailed paired Student t test]), mean portal venous perfusion was 1.22 and 1.26 mL/min/mL, mean total liver perfusion was 1.38 and 1.50 mL/min/mL (difference not significant), and the mean hepatic perfusion index was 0.12 and 0.16 (P = .002).
CONCLUSION: Arterial hepatic perfusion was significantly increased after orthotopic liver transplantation, but differences in portal venous and total liver perfusion were not significant. Dynamic single-section CT might also help evaluate hepatic vascular complications, chronic transplant rejection, and hepatic perfusion in liver cirrhosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9769823     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Quantitative tissue blood flow measurement of the liver parenchyma: comparison between xenon CT and perfusion CT.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Hashimoto; Takamichi Murakami; Keizo Dono; Masatoshi Hori; Tonsok Kim; Masayuki Kudo; Shigeru Marubashi; Atsushi Miyamoto; Yutaka Takeda; Hiroaki Nagano; Koji Umeshita; Hironobu Nakamura; Morito Monden
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Clinical application of hepatic CT perfusion.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Wen-Jing Wang; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Quantification of hepatic arterial and portal perfusion with dynamic computed tomography: comparison of maximum-slope and dual-input one-compartment model methods.

Authors:  Masaya Miyazaki; Yoshito Tsushima; Akiko Miyazaki; Bishnuhari Paudyal; Makoto Amanuma; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Analysis of microvascularity after reperfused acute myocardial infarction using the maximum slope method of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michinobu Nagao; Hiroshi Higashino; Hiroshi Matsuoka; Hideo Kawakami; Teruhito Mochizuki; Masahiko Uemura; Nobuko Tokunaga; Kenya Murase
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: feasibility of a prolonged dual-phase imaging protocol with tracer kinetics modeling.

Authors:  Tong San Koh; Choon Hua Thng; Septian Hartono; Puor Sherng Lee; Su Pin Choo; Donald Y H Poon; Han Chong Toh; Sotirios Bisdas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Assessment of the hepatic microvascular changes in liver cirrhosis by perfusion computed tomography.

Authors:  Mai-Lin Chen; Qing-Yu Zeng; Jian-Wei Huo; Xiao-Ming Yin; Bao-Ping Li; Jian-Xin Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Does the presence of distant and local malignancy alter parenchymal perfusion in apparently disease-free areas of the liver?

Authors:  Y Tsushima; M J Blomley; H Yokoyama; S Kusano; K Endo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Is liver perfusion CT reproducible? A study on intra- and interobserver agreement of normal hepatic haemodynamic parameters obtained with two different software packages.

Authors:  Elisa Almeida Sathler Bretas; Ulysses S Torres; Lucas Rios Torres; Daniel Bekhor; Celso Fernando Saito Filho; Douglas Jorge Racy; Lorenzo Faggioni; Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  CT perfusion at early stage of hepatic diffuse disease.

Authors:  Sheng Guan; Wei-Dong Zhao; Kang-Rong Zhou; Wei-Jun Peng; Jian Mao; Feng Tang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Four-dimensional transcatheter intraarterial perfusion (TRIP)-MRI for monitoring liver tumor embolization in VX2 rabbits.

Authors:  Dingxin Wang; Sumeet Virmani; Richard Tang; Barbara Szolc-Kowalska; Gayle Woloschak; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.