Literature DB >> 9768535

On-demand treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a comparison of ranitidine 75 mg with cimetidine 200 mg or placebo.

J P Galmiche1, G Shi, B Simon, F Casset-Semanza, A Slama.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effects of ranitidine 75 mg with those of either cimetidine 200 mg or placebo given on demand for relief of typical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease during a 15-day period.
METHODS: A total of 1336 patients (aged > or = 18 years) with heartburn episodes were recruited and randomly assigned to a ranitidine 75 mg, cimetidine 200 mg or placebo group. Depending on the occurrence or persistence of heartburn, treatment was administered as required up to three times daily, with at least 2 h between drug doses. Antacids were allowed as rescue medication if symptoms persisted for at least 2 h after the third medication on any given day. The primary end-point was defined as the proportion of patients with relief of at least 75% of heartburn episodes during the study period (i.e. relief occurring within 2 h after drug ingestion and lasting for at least 5 h).
RESULTS: Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat population comprising 504 subjects in the ranitidine group, 515 in the cimetidine group and 270 in the placebo group. Primary end-point success rates were 41, 38 and 28%, respectively, for the three groups (P < 0.001 for ranitidine vs. placebo, P = 0.274 for ranitidine vs. cimetidine). Ranitidine 75 mg was significantly more effective than placebo in providing overall heartburn relief (P < 0.001). The differences between the ranitidine and cimetidine groups were not significant, except for a greater reduction in heartburn frequency in the ranitidine group at the end of the study period (P < 0.05). Drug dose was lower and less rescue medication was used in the ranitidine group than the placebo group. The three treatment groups did not differ in terms of tolerability.
CONCLUSION: On-demand ranitidine 75 mg or cimetidine 200 mg are safe and effective treatment for reflux-related symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768535     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00384.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  8 in total

1.  Drug utilization evaluation of nonprescription H2-receptor antagonists and alginate-containing preparations for dyspepsia.

Authors:  J Krska; D N John; D Hansford; E J Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes.

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Which has superior acid-suppressive effect, 10 mg omeprazole once daily or 20 mg famotidine twice daily? Effects of single or repeated administration in Japanese Helicobacter pylori-negative CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers.

Authors:  Tomohiko Shimatani; Masaki Inoue; Tomoko Kuroiwa; Mutsuko Moriwaki; Jing Xu; Kazuro Ikawa; Norifumi Morikawa; Susumu Tazuma
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Meta-analysis: the effects of placebo treatment on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  F Cremonini; D C Ziogas; H Y Chang; E Kokkotou; J M Kelley; L Conboy; T J Kaptchuk; A J Lembo
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Effects of pantoprazole 20 mg in mildgastroesophageal reflux disease: Once-daily treatment in the acute phase, and comparison of on-demand versus continuous treatment in the long term.

Authors:  Werner Janssen; Eberhard Meier; Gudrun Gatz; Bernd Pfaffenberger
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-07

6.  A randomized open-label trial of on-demand rabeprazole vs ranitidine for patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

Authors:  Abdallah A Kobeissy; Jana G Hashash; Faek R Jamali; Assaad M Skoury; Reham Haddad; Sarah El-Samad; Rami Ladki; Rola Aswad; Assaad M Soweid
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations.

Authors:  John M Inadomi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Multilevel analyses of on-demand medication data, with an application to the treatment of Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder.

Authors:  Rob Kessels; Jos Bloemers; Adriaan Tuiten; Peter G M van der Heijden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.