Literature DB >> 12141885

On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations.

John M Inadomi1.   

Abstract

Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand. Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141885     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220090-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  34 in total

1.  Onset of action during on-demand treatment with maalox suspension or low-dose ranitidine for heartburn.

Authors:  R A Faaij; J M Van Gerven; I Jolivet-Landreau; A A Masclee; E M Vendrig; R C Schoemaker; L D Jacobs; A F Cohen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Symptomatic effect of a low-dose antacid regimen in reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  R Weberg; A Berstad
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  On demand therapy with omeprazole for the long-term management of patients with heartburn without oesophagitis--a placebo-controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  T Lind; T Havelund; L Lundell; H Glise; K Lauritsen; S A Pedersen; O Anker-Hansen; A Stubberöd; G Eriksson; R Carlsson; O Junghard
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  The role of the specialist in the diagnosis and short and long term care of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J Dent
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Acute effects of antacids on gastric juice components in duodenal ulcer patients.

Authors:  R Weberg; K Berstad; A Berstad
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.686

6.  On demand therapy of reflux oesophagitis--a prospective study of symptoms, patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Authors:  I Wilhelmsen; J G Hatlebakk; S Olafsson; A Berstad
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Post-prandial ranitidine is superior to post-prandial omeprazole in control of gastric acidity in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  R M Khoury; P O Katz; D O Castell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Omeprazole v ranitidine for prevention of relapse in reflux oesophagitis. A controlled double blind trial of their efficacy and safety.

Authors:  J Dent; N D Yeomans; M Mackinnon; W Reed; F M Narielvala; D J Hetzel; E Solcia; D J Shearman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Sucralfate versus cimetidine in reflux esophagitis. A single-blind multicenter study.

Authors:  W Hameeteman; D M v d Boomgaard; W Dekker; M Schrijver; I C Wesdorp; G N Tytgat
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  S Vigneri; R Termini; G Leandro; S Badalamenti; M Pantalena; V Savarino; F Di Mario; G Battaglia; G S Mela; A Pilotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Overutilization of proton-pump inhibitors: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  Joel J Heidelbaugh; Andrea H Kim; Robert Chang; Paul C Walker
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Pulmonary or otolaryngologic extraesophageal manifestations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Giampaolo Bresci; Rodolfo Sacco
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-02-16

3.  Pantoprazole on-demand effectively treats symptoms in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Theo Scholten; Iris Teutsch; Martina Bohuschke; Gudrun Gatz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Economic analysis of on-demand maintenance therapy with proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.

Authors:  Dyfrig A Hughes; Keith Bodger; Peter Bytzer; Dirk de Herdt; Dominique Dubois
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Proton pump inhibitors and risk of vitamin and mineral deficiency: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Joel J Heidelbaugh
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2013-06

6.  On-demand therapy with rabeprazole in nonerosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice: effectiveness, health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Julio Ponce; Lidia Argüello; Guillermo Bastida; Marta Ponce; Vicente Ortiz; Vicente Garrigues
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Proton pump inhibitors: potential cost reductions by applying prescribing guidelines.

Authors:  Caitriona Cahir; Tom Fahey; Lesley Tilson; Conor Teljeur; Kathleen Bennett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.