Literature DB >> 9768505

Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization.

D J Walker1, M N Branch.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1 pigeons pecked a key that was illuminated with a 501-nm light and obtained food by doing so according to a variable-interval (VI) schedule of reinforcement, the mean value of which differed across groups: either 30 s, 120 s, or 240 s. The pigeons in all three groups were trained for 10 50-min sessions. Generalization testing was conducted in extinction with different wavelengths of light. Absolute and relative generalization gradients were similar in shape for the three groups. Experiment 2 was a systematic replication of Experiment 1 using line orientation as the stimulus dimension and a mean VI value of either 30 s or 240 s. Again, gradients of generalization were similar for the two groups. In Experiment 3 pigeons pecked a key that was illuminated with a 501-nm light and obtained food reinforcers according to either a VI 30-s or a 240-s schedule. Training continued until response rates stabilized (> 30 sessions). For subjects trained with the 30-s schedule, generalization gradients were virtually identical regardless of whether training was for 10 sessions (Experiment 1) or until response rates stabilized. For subjects trained with the VI 240-s schedule, absolute generalization gradients for subjects trained to stability were displaced upward relative to gradients for subjects trained for only 10 sessions (Experiment 1), and relative generalization gradients were slightly flatter. These results indicate that the shape of a generalization gradient does not necessarily depend on the rate of reinforcement during 10-session single-stimulus training but that the effects of prolonged training on stimulus generalization may be schedule dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768505      PMCID: PMC1284676          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  A HABER; H I KALISH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Stimulus generalization of an instrumental response as a function of the number of reinforced trials.

Authors:  G MARGOLIUS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-02

4.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

5.  Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training.

Authors:  G W Farthing; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Color mixing with Kodak Wratten filters.

Authors:  J Lyons; W D Klipec
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Probability of reinforcement and the development of stimulus control.

Authors:  C O Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Supplementary report: stimulus generalization gradients along a luminosity continuum.

Authors:  G OLSON; R A KING
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-04

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Stimulus generalization and amount of prior training on variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  E Hearst; M B Koresko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Operant generalization of auditory tempo in quail neonates.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.