OBJECTIVE: An individualized computed tomography-based stereotactic technique for the longitudinal insertion of intrahippocampal electrodes is presented and its accuracy described. METHODS: The technique makes use of one well reproducible target in the hippocampal head and of the approximate inclination of the anteroposterior length axis of the hippocampus, for which the orbital floor is taken as an auxiliary landmark. It was used in 141 patients with medically intractable complex partial seizures. In 106 patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available for assessment of implantation accuracy. Each of the 212 electrodes was plotted on topographic drawings and its goodness of fit rated. RESULTS: Whereas hippocampal head and body were hit by 97 and 96% of the electrodes, respectively, the amygdala was hit by only 75% of the electrodes and mainly at its basal margin. For 93% of the electrodes, the inclination in a sagittal plane corresponded exactly to that of the hippocampus. The implantation morbidity amounted to 5.7%, whereas permanent neurological deficit occurred in one (0.7%) of the 141 patients. CONCLUSION: This computed tomography-based protocol proved to be reliable and hence can be considered as an adequate alternative to MRI-based stereotactic implantation if MRI is not available or if a single MRI-based stereotactic set-up is unreliable because of intolerable distortions.
OBJECTIVE: An individualized computed tomography-based stereotactic technique for the longitudinal insertion of intrahippocampal electrodes is presented and its accuracy described. METHODS: The technique makes use of one well reproducible target in the hippocampal head and of the approximate inclination of the anteroposterior length axis of the hippocampus, for which the orbital floor is taken as an auxiliary landmark. It was used in 141 patients with medically intractable complex partial seizures. In 106 patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available for assessment of implantation accuracy. Each of the 212 electrodes was plotted on topographic drawings and its goodness of fit rated. RESULTS: Whereas hippocampal head and body were hit by 97 and 96% of the electrodes, respectively, the amygdala was hit by only 75% of the electrodes and mainly at its basal margin. For 93% of the electrodes, the inclination in a sagittal plane corresponded exactly to that of the hippocampus. The implantation morbidity amounted to 5.7%, whereas permanent neurological deficit occurred in one (0.7%) of the 141 patients. CONCLUSION: This computed tomography-based protocol proved to be reliable and hence can be considered as an adequate alternative to MRI-based stereotactic implantation if MRI is not available or if a single MRI-based stereotactic set-up is unreliable because of intolerable distortions.
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; Rachel Sparks; Aidan G O'Keeffe; Roman Rodionov; Anna Miserocchi; Andrew McEvoy; Sebastien Ourselin; John Duncan Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: T Grunwald; H Beck; K Lehnertz; I Blümcke; N Pezer; M Kurthen; G Fernández; D Van Roost; H J Heinze; M Kutas; C E Elger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-10-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H Clusmann; T Kral; E Fackeldey; I Blümcke; C Helmstaedter; J von Oertzen; H Urbach; J Schramm Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Chengyuan Wu; Michael J LaRiviere; Nealen Laxpati; James J Evans; Robert E Gross; Ashwini D Sharan Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Timm Rosburg; Peter Trautner; Eva Ludowig; Carlo Schaller; Martin Kurthen; Christian E Elger; Nash N Boutros Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Seth R Batten; Elena A Matveeva; Sidney W Whiteheart; Thomas C Vanaman; Greg A Gerhardt; John T Slevin Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2017-08-13 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Florian Mormann; Hannes Osterhage; Ralph G Andrzejak; Bernd Weber; Guillén Fernández; Juergen Fell; Christian E Elger; Klaus Lehnertz Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 3.169