OBJECTIVE: A quantitative analysis of intraoperative cortical shift and deformation was performed to gain a better understanding of the nature and extent of this problem and the resultant loss of spatial accuracy in surgical procedures coregistered to preoperative imaging studies. METHODS: Three-dimensional feature tracking and two-dimensional image analysis of the cortical surface were used to quantify the observed motion. Data acquisition was facilitated by a ceiling-mounted robotic platform, which provided a number of precision tracking capabilities. The patient's head position and the size and orientation of the craniotomy were recorded at the start of surgery. Error analysis demonstrated that the surface displacement measuring methodology was accurate to 1 to 2 mm. Statistical tests were performed to examine correlations between the amount of displacement and the type of surgery, the nature of the cranial opening, the region of the brain involved, the duration of surgery, and the degree of invasiveness. RESULTS: The results showed that a displacement of an average of 1 cm occurred, with the dominant directional component being associated with gravity. The mean displacement was determined to be independent of the size and orientation of the cranial opening. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that loss of spatial registration with preoperative images is gravity-dominated and of sufficient extent that attention to errors resulting from misregistration during the course of surgery is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: A quantitative analysis of intraoperative cortical shift and deformation was performed to gain a better understanding of the nature and extent of this problem and the resultant loss of spatial accuracy in surgical procedures coregistered to preoperative imaging studies. METHODS: Three-dimensional feature tracking and two-dimensional image analysis of the cortical surface were used to quantify the observed motion. Data acquisition was facilitated by a ceiling-mounted robotic platform, which provided a number of precision tracking capabilities. The patient's head position and the size and orientation of the craniotomy were recorded at the start of surgery. Error analysis demonstrated that the surface displacement measuring methodology was accurate to 1 to 2 mm. Statistical tests were performed to examine correlations between the amount of displacement and the type of surgery, the nature of the cranial opening, the region of the brain involved, the duration of surgery, and the degree of invasiveness. RESULTS: The results showed that a displacement of an average of 1 cm occurred, with the dominant directional component being associated with gravity. The mean displacement was determined to be independent of the size and orientation of the cranial opening. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that loss of spatial registration with preoperative images is gravity-dominated and of sufficient extent that attention to errors resulting from misregistration during the course of surgery is warranted.
Authors: Michael I Miga; Tuhin K Sinha; David M Cash; Robert L Galloway; Robert J Weil Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Sean Jy-Shyang Chen; Ingerid Reinertsen; Pierrick Coupé; Charles X B Yan; Laurence Mercier; D Rolando Del Maestro; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Alex Hartov; Keith Paulsen; Songbai Ji; Kathryn Fontaine; Marie-Laure Furon; Andrea Borsic; David Roberts Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Adam Wittek; Grand Joldes; Mathieu Couton; Simon K Warfield; Karol Miller Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Kay Sun; Thomas S Pheiffer; Amber L Simpson; Jared A Weis; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.316