C C Earle1, W K Evans. 1. Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ont.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the expenditures associated with single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol) with those of best supportive care as treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The primary data sets of 2 phase II trials of paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC were obtained. Paclitaxel delivery costs were estimated at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre using the mean paclitaxel dose from the 2 phase II trials, 214 mg/m2, a 3-week schedule and a median of 3 treatment cycles. Data regarding dosage, costs and survival were incorporated into the Statistics Canada POpulation HEalth Model (POHEM), which generated hypothetical cohorts of patients treated either with best supportive care or paclitaxel. The POHEM model assigned diagnostic workup, treatment, disease progression and survival characteristics to each of these cohorts and tabulated the costs associated with each. RESULTS: The total cost of administering 3 cycles of chemotherapy was Can$8143 per patient. The strategy of treating NSCLC patients with paclitaxel cost $3375 more per patient than best supportive care. On the basis of the difference in survival duration between stage IV patients treated in the best supportive care arm of a previous National Cancer Institute of Canada trial and those represented in the pooled phase II survival results, the cost per life-year saved was $4778. For sensitivity analyses, the days of hospitalization for terminal care, number of cycles given and survival benefit produced were varied. The sensitivity analysis produced a cost per life-year saved of up to $21,377 under the least favourable assumptions. CONCLUSION: If large phase III trials confirm the survival benefits observed in the phase II trials, paclitaxel can be considered to be a cost-effective agent in the management of advanced NSCLC.
PURPOSE: To compare the expenditures associated with single-agent paclitaxel (Taxol) with those of best supportive care as treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The primary data sets of 2 phase II trials of paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC were obtained. Paclitaxel delivery costs were estimated at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre using the mean paclitaxel dose from the 2 phase II trials, 214 mg/m2, a 3-week schedule and a median of 3 treatment cycles. Data regarding dosage, costs and survival were incorporated into the Statistics Canada POpulation HEalth Model (POHEM), which generated hypothetical cohorts of patients treated either with best supportive care or paclitaxel. The POHEM model assigned diagnostic workup, treatment, disease progression and survival characteristics to each of these cohorts and tabulated the costs associated with each. RESULTS: The total cost of administering 3 cycles of chemotherapy was Can$8143 per patient. The strategy of treating NSCLCpatients with paclitaxel cost $3375 more per patient than best supportive care. On the basis of the difference in survival duration between stage IV patients treated in the best supportive care arm of a previous National Cancer Institute of Canada trial and those represented in the pooled phase II survival results, the cost per life-year saved was $4778. For sensitivity analyses, the days of hospitalization for terminal care, number of cycles given and survival benefit produced were varied. The sensitivity analysis produced a cost per life-year saved of up to $21,377 under the least favourable assumptions. CONCLUSION: If large phase III trials confirm the survival benefits observed in the phase II trials, paclitaxel can be considered to be a cost-effective agent in the management of advanced NSCLC.