Literature DB >> 9765749

Erythropoietin in the management of patients with nonhematologic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Systemic Treatment Program Committee.

I Quirt1, S Micucci, L A Moran, J Pater, G Browman.   

Abstract

GUIDELINE QUESTIONS: 1) Does erythropoietin (EPO) reduce the need for transfusion of red blood cells in patients receiving chemotherapy for a nonhematologic cancer? 2) Does the administration of EPO improve the quality of life of these cancer patients?
OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations regarding the use of EPO to reduce the need for transfusion of red blood cells in patients receiving chemotherapy for a nonhematologic cancer. OUTCOMES: First transfusion requirement from the start of chemotherapy is the main outcome of interest. Quality of life and costs are also considered. PERSPECTIVE (VALUES): Evidence was selected and reviewed by 5 members of the Ontario Cancer Treatment Practice Guidelines Initiative (OCTPGI) and the Systemic Treatment Program Committee (STPC). Drafts of this document have been circulated to and reviewed by members of the STPC. The STPC comprises medical oncologists, pharmacists, supportive care personnel and administrators. No community representative participated in the development of this practice guideline. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs), most placebo-controlled, were available for review. A meta-analysis was performed with 8 trials that shared a clinically relevant outcome measure. Only 1 trial assessed quality of life. BENEFITS: The meta-analysis showed a relative risk for transfusion among EPO patients of 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.78), which translates into a 36% relative reduction in the proportion of patients requiring transfusion (p = 0.00001). Reduction in transfusion requirements was similar across strata defined by methodological quality, EPO dose, hematologic status, tumour type at trial entry and chemotherapy regimen. In the 1 trial that assessed quality of life, EPO was associated with improved quality of life. HARMS: Hypertension has been noted rarely in EPO-treated cancer patients. The RCTs did not report adverse effects in EPO-treated patients compared with control patients during the follow-up period. Long-term adverse effects are unknown. EPO is more costly than transfusion, but formal cost-effectiveness studies are unavailable. PRACTICE GUIDELINE: For patients receiving chemotherapy for nonhematologic cancer in whom symptoms of anemia are expected and in whom transfusion of red blood cells is not considered an acceptable treatment option, EPO can be recommended as a safe, effective treatment alternative. The evidence in support of using EPO is stronger for patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy regimens that for those receiving non-platinum-based regimens. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE DATE: Apr. 4, 1997.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9765749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Control        ISSN: 1206-548X


  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug-induced myelosuppression : diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Peter J Carey
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Onco-nephrology: an appraisal of the cancer and chronic kidney disease links.

Authors:  Hassan Izzedine; Mark A Perazella
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  A multi-center open-labeled study of recombinant erythropoietin-beta in the treatment of anemic patients with multiple myeloma, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Chinese population.

Authors:  Shen Yang; Ma Jun; Zhu Hong-Li; Wang Jian-Min; Wang Chun; Qiu Lu-Gui; Zhao Yong-Qiang; Zhu Jun; Hou Jian; Shen Zhi-Xiang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  The pharmacokinetic profile of recombinant human erythropoietin is unchanged in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Stuart A McCluskey; Wing K Cheung; Rita Katznelson; Humara Poonawala; Ludwik Fedorko; George Djaiani; Bobby Mehta; Keyvan Karkouti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Mary E Johnston; Manya L Charette; Steve E Hanna; Alejandro R Jadad; George P Browman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.