Literature DB >> 9763513

Tension-sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation in vitro.

R B Nicklas1, M S Campbell, S C Ward, G J Gorbsky.   

Abstract

Many cells have a checkpoint that detects a single misattached chromosome and delays anaphase, allowing time for error correction. Detection probably depends on tension-sensitive kinetochore protein phosphorylation. Somehow, mechanical tension, or some consequence of tension, produces a chemical change, dephosphorylation. The mechanism of tension-mediated dephosphorylation can be approached using an in vitro system. Earlier work showed that the kinetochores of washed chromosomes from a mammalian cell line can be phosphorylated in vitro simply by incubation with ATP and a phosphatase inhibitor. We confirm this for chromosomes from insect meiotic cells. Thus, kinetochores of washed chromosomes from diverse sources contain a complete phosphorylation system: a kinase, a phosphatase and the substrate protein(s). We show that phosphorylation in vitro is sensitive to tension, as it is in living cells. This makes the conditions required for phosphorylation in vitro relevant to the process in living cells. The phosphatase is ruled out as the tension-sensitive component in vitro, leaving either the kinase or the substrate as the sensitive component. We show that a kinase extracted from mammalian cells in mitosis phosphorylates the kinetochores of insect meiotic chromosomes very effectively. The mammalian kinase under-phosphorylates the kinetochore of the insect's X-chromosome, just as the native insect kinase does. This provides a clue to the evolution of a chromosome that is not detected by the checkpoint. The mammalian kinase is not tightly bound to the chromosome and thus functions primarily in solution. This suggests that the substrate's phosphorylatable groups are freely available to outside constituents, e.g. regulators, as well as to the kinetochore's own kinase and phosphatase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9763513     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.111.21.3189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  24 in total

1.  Kinetochore reproduction in animal evolution: cell biological explanation of karyotypic fission theory.

Authors:  R L Kolnicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  M G Poirier; J F Marko
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Mechanical impulses can control metaphase progression in a mammalian cell.

Authors:  Takeshi Itabashi; Yasuhiko Terada; Kenta Kuwana; Tetsuo Kan; Isao Shimoyama; Shin'ichi Ishiwata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Back to the roots: segregation of univalent sex chromosomes in meiosis.

Authors:  Gunar Fabig; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Lysed cell models and isolated chromosomes for the study of kinetochore/centromere biochemistry in vitro.

Authors:  John R Daum; Gary J Gorbsky
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  A mechanobiochemical mechanism for monooriented chromosome oscillation in mitosis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Arshad Desai; José N Onuchic; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An integrated mechanobiochemical feedback mechanism describes chromosome motility from prometaphase to anaphase in mitosis.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Arshad Desai; José N Onuchic; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Bub1 and BubR1: at the interface between chromosome attachment and the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Sabine Elowe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal.

Authors:  Thomas J Maresca; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Drosophila Polo regulates the spindle assembly checkpoint through Mps1-dependent BubR1 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Carlos Conde; Mariana Osswald; João Barbosa; Tatiana Moutinho-Santos; Diana Pinheiro; Sofia Guimarães; Irina Matos; Helder Maiato; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.