G H Zoarski1, J M Mathis, J R Hebel. 1. Department of Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore 21201, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Published reports of controlled experiments designed to evaluate the performance of over-the-wire microcatheter systems are rare and have often been based on subjective impressions from small clinical series. This investigation was designed to compare the load forces required to propel state-of-the-art, hydrophilically coated microcatheters from each of four manufacturers through a standardized tortuous pathway constructed of polytetrafluoroethylene tubing. METHODS: Currently available hydrophilically coated microcatheters were provided by four manufacturers. A 20-cm long, three-dimensional pathway simulating the intracranial carotid circulation was constructed of 0.065-in. (inner diameter) polytetrafluoroethylene tubing and immersed in a water bath at 37 degrees C. Testing was performed using an Instron tabletop load frame fitted with a 2-lb load cell. Durability and load force tests were conducted using a 0.014-in. stainless steel noncoated guidewire, with the wire tip protruding 1 cm beyond the catheter tip. At least four samples of microcatheters from each manufacturer were tested. RESULTS: Extensive trackability testing of the guidewire alone established reproducible performance with maximum load forces of less than 8 g. Maximum gram forces for the four reinforced microcatheters were not greatly different, measuring between 9 and 14 g. Excessive buckling of the only nonreinforced catheter was initially overcome early in the pathway in a staccato, stepwise fashion. After reaching a critical load, however, the catheter and guidewire prolapsed. CONCLUSION: All reinforced microcatheters tested established good and reproducible performance in our model. Reinforced microcatheters provided superior trackability over the one nonreinforced device tested.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Published reports of controlled experiments designed to evaluate the performance of over-the-wire microcatheter systems are rare and have often been based on subjective impressions from small clinical series. This investigation was designed to compare the load forces required to propel state-of-the-art, hydrophilically coated microcatheters from each of four manufacturers through a standardized tortuous pathway constructed of polytetrafluoroethylene tubing. METHODS: Currently available hydrophilically coated microcatheters were provided by four manufacturers. A 20-cm long, three-dimensional pathway simulating the intracranial carotid circulation was constructed of 0.065-in. (inner diameter) polytetrafluoroethylene tubing and immersed in a water bath at 37 degrees C. Testing was performed using an Instron tabletop load frame fitted with a 2-lb load cell. Durability and load force tests were conducted using a 0.014-in. stainless steel noncoated guidewire, with the wire tip protruding 1 cm beyond the catheter tip. At least four samples of microcatheters from each manufacturer were tested. RESULTS: Extensive trackability testing of the guidewire alone established reproducible performance with maximum load forces of less than 8 g. Maximum gram forces for the four reinforced microcatheters were not greatly different, measuring between 9 and 14 g. Excessive buckling of the only nonreinforced catheter was initially overcome early in the pathway in a staccato, stepwise fashion. After reaching a critical load, however, the catheter and guidewire prolapsed. CONCLUSION: All reinforced microcatheters tested established good and reproducible performance in our model. Reinforced microcatheters provided superior trackability over the one nonreinforced device tested.