Literature DB >> 9762743

The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults.

J D Cassidy1, L J Carroll, P Côté.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional, mailed survey.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the lifetime, 6-month period, and point prevalence of low back pain and its related disability among Saskatchewan adults and to investigate the presence and strength of selective response bias. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been many reports of the prevalence of low back pain in different populations, and the estimates vary widely depending on case definition. However, most studies fail to differentiate between trivial and disabling back pain, which raises the issue of the usefulness of these estimates. No studies have yet documented the prevalence of graded low back pain severity and its related disability in a North American, general, population-based survey.
METHODS: The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to a probability sample of 2184 Saskatchewan adults between 20 and 69 years of age. Fifty-five percent of the eligible population responded to the survey. Respondents were compared with nonrespondents, and the presence of selective response bias by back pain status was investigated by wave analysis. The point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain was determined by simple questions, and the 6-month period prevalence of low back pain was determined by the Chronic Pain Questionnaire. All estimates were age standardized to the Saskatchewan population.
RESULTS: The authors estimate that at the time of the survey 28.4% (95% confidence interval, 25.6-31.1) of the Saskatchewan adult population were experiencing low back pain, and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.9-86.3) had experienced it during their lifetime. Overall, 48.9% (95% confidence interval, 45.9-52.0) of the population had experienced low intensity/low-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months, 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 10.3-14.4) had experienced high-intensity/low-disability low back pain, and an additional 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.8-12.5) had experienced high-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months. There was little variation in the estimates over age groups, but women experienced more high-disability back pain than men. There was no evidence of selective response bias by low back pain status in the survey.
CONCLUSION: Low-intensity/low-disability low back pain is a common problem in the general population. Approximately 11% of the adult population studied had been disabled by low back pain in the previous 6 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762743     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  127 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  P C Wing
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The diagnostic validity and therapeutic value of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without adjuvant agents.

Authors:  L Manchikanti; V Pampati; B Fellows; C E Bakhit
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

3.  Is low back pain associated with worse health-related quality of life 6 months later?

Authors:  Paul S Nolet; Vicki L Kristman; Pierre Côté; Linda J Carroll; J David Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.

Authors:  J T Kessler; M Melloh; Thomas Zweig; E Aghayev; C Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective.

Authors:  Benjamin W Friedman; Mikaela Chilstrom; Polly E Bijur; E John Gallagher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cross-sectional view of factors associated with back pain.

Authors:  Chung-Yol Lee; Renato Kratter; Nicole Duvoisin; Aydin Taskin; Julian Schilling
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Slawomira Lipinski; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Re: Characterization of side effects sustained by chiropractic students during their undergraduate training in technique class at a chiropractic college: a preliminary retrospective study.

Authors:  Rocco Guerriero
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-09

9.  The effect of loading rate and degeneration on neutral region motion in human cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin Zhao; Emir Boumediene; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Low Back Pain Prevalence and Related Workplace Psychosocial Risk Factors: A Study Using Data From the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Scott Haldeman; Ming-Lun Lu; Dean Baker
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.