Literature DB >> 9762510

Quality assurance and quality control in longitudinal studies.

C W Whitney1, B K Lind, P W Wahl.   

Abstract

As we have presented, it is evident that cohort studies are confronted with their own special, non-trivial issues of quality assurance and quality control. Such studies are typically large-scale designs and involve an extensive amount of data to be collected and processed, the quality of which depends on a variety of factors related to study personnel and equipment. The fact that data are collected over an extended period of time and at several centers greatly increases the magnitude of the data processing task, significantly increasing the likelihood of discrepancies and measurement error in the data. As presented in tables 1 and 2, the quality assurance and quality control procedures span the entire course of the study and include a multitude of tasks. Such tasks are delegated to various committees and/or are undertaken by participating centers, all of which must take responsibility for understanding, implementing, and following through on all procedures that maximize data quality. The quality of the quality assurance/quality control process is highly correlated with the quality of the communication within and between centers and all researchers. Maintaining standardization of procedures across centers and long-term stability of equipment and analytic procedures are integral components of quality control. In conclusion, the magnitude of the quality control process in a multicenter longitudinal study should not be underestimated, requiring a significant commitment of study resources. The quality control process is key to the integrity of the study, and an integral part of the design of the study. In a well-designed study, with a good quality control process and dedication to the process by the research team, the validity of the conclusions of the cohort study can be established.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762510     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Rev        ISSN: 0193-936X            Impact factor:   6.222


  34 in total

Review 1.  Defining and improving data quality in medical registries: a literature review, case study, and generic framework.

Authors:  Danielle G T Arts; Nicolette F De Keizer; Gert-Jan Scheffer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Quality control for interviews to obtain dietary recalls from children for research studies.

Authors:  Nicole M Shaffer; Suzanne Domel Baxter; William O Thompson; Michelle L Baglio; Caroline H Guinn; Francesca H A Frye
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-10

3.  Interviewer variability - quality aspects in a case-control study.

Authors:  Kerstin J Blomgren; Anders Sundström; Gunnar Steineck; Bengt-Erik Wiholm
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  On genetic studies of bone loss.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Hui Shen; Hui Jiang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Determinants of quality of interview and impact on risk estimates in a case-control study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Cristina M Villanueva; Debra T Silverman; Núria Malats; Adonina Tardon; Reina Garcia-Closas; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Joan Fortuny; Nathaniel Rothman; Mustafa Dosemeci; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparison of whole genome linkage scans in premenopausal and postmenopausal women: no bone-loss-specific QTLs were implicated.

Authors:  H Yan; Y-J Liu; Q Zhou; P Xiao; R R Recker; H-W Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Defining and Developing a Generic Framework for Monitoring Data Quality in Clinical Research.

Authors:  Miss Lauren Houston; A/Prof Ping Yu; Dr Allison Martin; Dr Yasmine Probst
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

8.  Data collection using open access technology in multicentre operational research involving patient interviews.

Authors:  H D Shewade; S S Chadha; V Gupta; J P Tripathy; S Satyanarayana; K Sagili; S Mohanty; O P Bera; P Pandey; P Rajeswaran; G Jayaraman; A Santhappan; U N Bajpai; A M Mamatha; R Maiser; A J Naqvi; S Pandurangan; S Nath; V H Ghule; A Das; B M Prasad; M Biswas; G Singh; G Mallick; A J Jeyakumar Jaisingh; R Rao; A M V Kumar
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2017-03-21

9.  Setting the Stage: Creating Study Sites That Promote the Safety and Dignity of Research Participants.

Authors:  Amy B Smoyer; Alana Rosenberg; Kim M Blankenship
Journal:  Soc Work Res       Date:  2014-07-03

10.  Multiplex assay reliability and long-term intra-individual variation of serologic inflammatory biomarkers.

Authors:  Heather S McKay; Joseph B Margolick; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Joseph Lopez; John Phair; Giovanna Rappocciolo; Thomas N Denny; Larry I Magpantay; Lisa P Jacobson; Jay H Bream
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.