Literature DB >> 9761093

Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality.

K T Spencer1, J Bednarz, P G Rafter, C Korcarz, R M Lang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether harmonic imaging (HI) improves endocardial visualization during 2-dimensional echocardiography without echocardiographic contrast. HI differs from fundamental imaging (FI) by transmitting ultrasound at one frequency and receiving at twice the transmitted frequency. This technique has been used in conjunction with contrast echocardiography to enhance myocardial contrast visualization. HI and FI were sequentially performed in 20 patients. Images were digitally stored and subsequently reviewed by 2 observers for the quality of endocardial visualization. In addition, acoustic quantification was performed in both FI and HI modes and endocardial tracking qualitatively judged. HI was compared with FI during dobutamine stress echocardiography in 17 patients who were imaged at baseline and peak stress. Overall, the harmonic images had less clutter and better myocardial blood contrast. Individual segments were better visualized with HI in 30% to 73% of cases. The acoustic quantification endocardial tracking was rated better with HI in 67% of short-axis views and in 58% of apical 4-chamber views. During dobutamine stress testing the overall number of interpretable segments improved from 64% for FI to 84% with HI. Many segments traditionally difficult to image were improved with HI. HI without the use of contrast agents improved endocardial visualization during routine 2-dimensional echocardiography. This improved endocardial visualization led to better endocardial tracking with acoustic quantification and to more segments being clinically interpretable during dobutamine stress testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9761093     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00457-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and economic outcomes assessment with myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  L J Shaw; M J Monaghan; P Nihoyannopolous
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Comparison of methods of fractional area change for detection of regional left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  S Carstensen; U Hoest; L Kjoeller-Hansen; K Saunamäki; D Atar; H Kelbaek
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-08

3.  An enhanced method for left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by triggered harmonic contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  K Hirooka; Y Yasumura; Y Tsujita; A Hanatani; S Nakatani; K Miyatake; M Yamagishi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Contrast agents provide a faster learning curve in dipyridamole stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Jose Zamorano; Violeta Sánchez; Raúl Moreno; Carlos Almería; Jose Rodrigo; Viviana Serra; Luis Azcona; Adalia Aubele; Luis Mataix; Luis Sánchez-Harguindey
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Impact of harmonic imaging on transthoracic echocardiographic identification of infective endocarditis and its complications.

Authors:  F Chirillo; A Pedrocco; A De Leo; A Bruni; O Totis; P Meneghetti; P Stritoni
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Ultrasonic multipath and beamforming clutter reduction: a chirp model approach.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Marko Jakovljevic
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Improved identification of viable myocardium using second harmonic imaging during dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Authors:  F B Sozzi; D Poldermans; J J Bax; A Elhendy; E C Vourvouri; R Valkema; J De Sutter; A F Schinkel; A Borghetti; J R Roelandt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality.

Authors:  A Franke; R Hoffmann; H P Kühl; W Lepper; O A Breithardt; M Schormann; P Hanrath
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Quantitative assessment of the magnitude, impact and spatial extent of ultrasonic clutter.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju; Michael J Pihl; Jeremy J Dahl; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Possible beneficial effect of olmesartan medoxomil on left atrial function in patients with hypertension : noninvasive assessment by acoustic quantification.

Authors:  Hui-Ping Gong; Wei Zhang; Li Li; Hong-Wei Tan; Zhi-Yong Ma; Xue-Zhen Zhong; Zhi-Hao Wang; Tao Song; Yun Zhang; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.