Literature DB >> 9756807

Economic evaluation and randomised controlled trial of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: UK collaborative trial. The Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Economics Working Group.

T E Roberts1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the resource implications and short term outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional management for term babies with severe respiratory failure.
DESIGN: Cost effectiveness evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: 55 approved recruiting hospitals in the United Kingdom. These hospitals provided conventional management, but infants randomised to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were transferred to one of five specialist centres.
SUBJECTS: 185 mature newborn infants (gestational age at birth >35 weeks, birth weight >2 kg) with severe respiratory failure (oxygenation index >40) recruited between 1993 and 1995. The commonest diagnoses were persistent pulmonary hypertension due to meconium aspiration, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, isolated persistent fetal circulation, sepsis, and idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cost effectiveness based on survival at 1 year of age without severe disability.
RESULTS: 63 (68%) of the 93 infants randomised to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survived to 1 year compared with 38 (41%) of the 92 infants who received conventional management. Of those that survived, one infant in each arm was lost to follow up and the proportion with disability at 1 year was similar in the two arms of the trial. One child in each arm had severe disability. The estimated additional cost of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation per additional surviving infant without severe disability was 51 222 pounds and the cost per surviving infant with no disability was 75 327 pounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for term neonates with severe respiratory failure would increase overall survival without disability. Although the policy will increase costs of neonatal health care, it is likely to be as cost effective as other life extending technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756807      PMCID: PMC28674          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7163.911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  Economic analysis in randomized control trials.

Authors:  M E Adams; N T McCall; D T Gray; M J Orza; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Cost of neonatal care across a regional health authority.

Authors:  R Fordham; D J Field; S Hodges; C Normand; E Mason; P Burton; J Yates; S Male
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1992-06

Review 3.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  A W Sosnowski; S J Bonser; D J Field; T R Graham; R K Firmin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-11

4.  'Quick and clean': authoritative health technology assessment for local health care contracting.

Authors:  A Stevens; D Colin-Jones; J Gabbay
Journal:  Health Trends       Date:  1995

5.  Research and development for the National Health Service.

Authors:  M Peckham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal ECMO using existing evidence.

Authors:  S Howard; M Mugford; C Normand; D Elbourne; A Grant; D Field; A Johnson
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  The cost of neonatal care: reviewing the evidence.

Authors:  M Mugford
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1995

8.  Are guidelines for peer-reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice.

Authors:  T Jefferson; V Demicheli
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Costing neonatal care alongside the Collaborative ECMO trial: how much primary research is required?

Authors:  S Howard; C Normand; M Mugford; D Elbourne; D Field; A Johnson; K Enock; A Grant
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Standard cost lists for healthcare in Canada. Issues in validity and inter-provincial consolidation.

Authors:  P Jacobs; N P Roos
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  UK trial of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation gave biased estimate of efficacy.

Authors:  F Shann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-13

3.  New BMJ policy on economic evaluations. Response of NHS Economic Evaluation Database Research Team.

Authors:  Dawn Craig; John Nixon; Nigel Armstrong; Julie Glanville; Jos Kleijnen; Michael Drummond
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

4.  Less is More: not (always) simple-the case of extracorporeal devices in critical care.

Authors:  Eddy Fan; Christian Karagiannidis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Cost effectiveness analysis of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on four year results from the UK Collaborative ECMO Trial.

Authors:  S Petrou; L Edwards
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  IMOP: randomised placebo controlled trial of outpatient cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour - clinical trial with analyses of efficacy, cost effectiveness and acceptability.

Authors:  Shrikant Bollapragada; Fiona Mackenzie; John Norrie; Stavros Petrou; Margaret Reid; Ian Greer; Inass Osman; Jane E Norman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR).

Authors:  Mariamma M Thalanany; Miranda Mugford; Clare Hibbert; Nicola J Cooper; Ann Truesdale; Steven Robinson; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati; Diana R Elbourne; Giles J Peek; Felicity Clemens; Polly Hardy; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Cost-effectiveness of neonatal surgery for congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Na Eun Kim; Dominique Vervoot; Ahmad Hammouri; Cristiana Riboni; Hosni Salem; Caris Grimes; Naomi Jane Wright
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.