Literature DB >> 8690565

A cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal ECMO using existing evidence.

S Howard1, M Mugford, C Normand, D Elbourne, A Grant, D Field, A Johnson.   

Abstract

A cost-effectiveness analysis is part of the U.K. ECMO Trial. In preparation for this analysis, existing evidence on the costs and effectiveness of neonatal ECMO was evaluated. ECMO appears to be more costly but may be more or less effective than conventional treatment. No case can be made for introducing ECMO before trial results are available.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690565     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300009417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  4 in total

1.  Our study 20 years on: UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  D J Macrae; D J Field
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic implications of new therapies in sepsis.

Authors:  Kelly A Wood; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Economic evaluation and randomised controlled trial of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: UK collaborative trial. The Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Economics Working Group.

Authors:  T E Roberts
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

4.  Features of randomised trials designed by the NPEU Perinatal Trials Service during Adrian Grant's directorship.

Authors:  Diana Elbourne
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.