Literature DB >> 9755788

A personal history of stapedectomy.

J J Shea1.   

Abstract

Aristotle has said the essential ingredient of tragedy is first hubris. Fame leads to the hubris that offends the gods, who send great punishment. This is so true in the history of stapedectomy. The three distinct eras of surgery for otosclerosis teach us a lot about what happens in science and in life. The first stapes era began in Europe, ahead of its time, and in those halcyon days before the turn of the century, the Belle Epoch, proceeded, uncorrected to its tragic extreme, and then was stopped suddenly, quite rightly, by the establishment. The fenestration era proceeded to an extreme, when its technical master Julius Lempert would allow no criticism or improvement in "his" one-stage endaural technique, however good, nor would he accept the new mobilization and stapedectomy operations, and he and it ended badly. The fact that Jenkins and Holmgren would make an opening in the lateral semicircular canal and then close it in the epitympanum, not open to the ear canal, to expect to improve hearing is amazing. Until Sourdille went to Stockholm and saw one closed fenestration operation performed by Holmgren and devised his "open to the ear canal technique," the closed fenestration operation was not reasonable. Then Sourdille came to New York City, and Lempert heard him speak and read and reread his publication and greatly improved on his operation. It was Lempert's one-stage endaural open operation that gave the fenestration operation the worldwide acceptance it gained. The second stapedectomy era began before the fenestration era ended with the accidental and originally unrecognized mobilization of the stapes by Rosen and my resurrection of stapedectomy. I realized in reading the literature of the past that stapedectomy was not necessarily fatal to the ear or the patient as was generally believed, and what was needed was to seal the oval window with a living elastic membrane and reconstruct the sound-conducting mechanism of the middle ear with a biocompatible implant prosthesis to make it successful. But for me, in 1955-1956, the "Zeitgeist" was finally right. I realized the stapes could be removed and covered the oval window with a vein graft, and Harry Treace made me a biocompatible implant prosthesis out of the newly discovered Teflon. For a new technology to be accepted, it must be much better than what it replaces, and stapedectomy was much better than fenestration. In the new microsurgical era of otology that began, improvements in the stapedectomy operation came from everywhere and were readily accepted. Stapedectomy has now become so successful, like many treatments in medicine, the problem has now largely disappeared. If the measles virus is the cause of the growth of the otosclerotic focus, as it seems to be, then vaccination against measles eventually will eliminate the hearing loss of otosclerosis completely. What the history of stapedectomy reveals is the truth of the quotation from Ecclesiastes, "There is nothing new under the sun." Progress is only made when the Zeitgeist is right, by someone who puts together the truths of the past with the new discoveries of the present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9755788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otol        ISSN: 0192-9763


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cholesteatoma and otosclerosis: two slowly progressive causes of hearing loss treatable through corrective surgery.

Authors:  James J Holt
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2003-04

2.  A comparison of hearing results following stapedotomy under local versus general anesthesia.

Authors:  Maureen Loewenthal; Nathan Jowett; Chia-Jung Busch; Rainald Knecht; Carsten V Dalchow
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Treatment of otosclerosis with a superelastic nitinol piston: first results.

Authors:  F Bast; S Weikert; T Schrom
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-09

4.  The influence of measles vaccination on the incidence of otosclerosis in Germany.

Authors:  Wolfgang Arnold; Raymonde Busch; Andreas Arnold; Björn Ritscher; Albrecht Neiss; Hans Peter Niedermeyer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Comparison of different oval window sealing materials in stapes surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alfonso Scarpa; Pasquale Marra; Massimo Ralli; Pasquale Viola; Federico Maria Gioacchini; Giuseppe Chiarella; Francesco Antonio Salzano; Pietro De Luca; Filippo Ricciardiello; Claudia Cassandro; Grazia Maria Corbi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  [Stapes surgery : first experiences with the new Soft-CliP piston].

Authors:  C Brase; J Zenk; J Wurm; B Schick; H Iro; J Hornung
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  An overview of the etiology of otosclerosis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Markou; John Goudakos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Passive and active middle ear implants.

Authors:  Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

9.  Nitinol versus non-Nitinol prostheses in otosclerosis surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Roque Reis; M Donato; G Almeida; L Castelhano; P Escada
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  The distance between stapedial footplate and incus in otosclerosis surgery.

Authors:  Ali Eftekharian; Navid Ahmady Roozbahany; Somayeh Shomali
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.