Literature DB >> 9754512

Outcomes of telephone medical care.

H Delichatsios1, M Callahan, M Charlson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To document the outcomes of a telephone coverage system and identify patient characteristics that may predict these outcomes.
DESIGN: Telephone survey.
SETTING: An academic outpatient medical practice that has a physician telephone coverage service. PATIENTS: All patients (483) who called during the 3-week study period to speak to a physician were evaluated, and for the 180 patients with symptoms, attempts were made to survey them by telephone 1 week after their initial telephone call.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age of the 180 patients was 41 years, 71% were female, and 56% belonged to commercial managed care plans. In the week after the initial telephone call, the following outcomes were reported: 27% of the patients had no further contact with the practice; 9% filled a prescription medication; 19% called the practice again; 48% kept an earlier appointment in the practice; 3% saw an internist elsewhere; 8% saw a specialist; 8% went to an emergency department; 4% were admitted to a hospital. Of the 180 patients who called with symptoms, 160 (89%) were successfully contacted for survey. Eighty-seven percent of these 160 patients rated their satisfaction with the care they received over the telephone as excellent, very good, or good. In multivariate analysis, patients' own health perception identified those most likely to have symptom relief (p = .002), and symptom relief, in turn, was a strong predictor of high patient satisfaction (p = .006). Thirty-three percent of the 160 patients reported that they would have gone to an emergency department if a physician were not available by telephone.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, younger patients, female patients, and patients in commercial managed care plans used the telephone most frequently. Also, the telephone provided a viable alternative to emergency department and walk-in visits. Overall satisfaction with telephone medicine was high, and the strongest predictors of high patient satisfaction were symptom relief and patients' own health perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9754512      PMCID: PMC1497020          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00179.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  20 in total

1.  Physicians need better line on how, when to respond to patients via telephone.

Authors:  J W Zylke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Telephone patient management by primary care physicians.

Authors:  S E Radecki; R E Neville; R A Girard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Phone fees: a justification of physician charges.

Authors:  S S Braithwaite; N O Unferth
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1993

4.  Telephone fees: are they worth it?

Authors:  D J Isaacman
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1993

5.  Compensating physicians for telephone calls.

Authors:  P C Sorum
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Characteristics of patients who highly utilize telephone medical care in a private practice.

Authors:  A J Daugird; D C Spencer
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up.

Authors:  J Wasson; C Gaudette; F Whaley; A Sauvigne; P Baribeau; H G Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Evaluation of the use and usefulness of telephone consultations in one general practice.

Authors:  J P Nagle; K McMahon; M Barbour; D Allen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Telephone medicine in a southern university private practice.

Authors:  R E Morrison; K L Arheart; W Rimner
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.378

10.  Can you hold please? How internal medicine residents deal with patient telephone calls. Telephone Encounters Learning Initiative Group.

Authors:  M D Hannis; D M Elnicki; D K Morris; M T Flannery
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.378

View more
  10 in total

1.  Telephone medicine for internists.

Authors:  D M Elnicki; P Ogden; M Flannery; M Hannis; S Cykert
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Telephone consultations.

Authors:  Josip Car; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-03

3.  Telephone triage: a timely data source for surveillance of influenza-like diseases.

Authors:  Jeremy U Espino; William R Hogan; Michael M Wagner
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  Tips for telephone and electronic medical consultation.

Authors:  Sailesh G Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  Directory assistance for telephone care: a toll-free way to improve the quality of communication between patients, providers, and investigators.

Authors:  J H Wasson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Process of Post-operative Telephone Follow-up Implementation for Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Brayden Forbes; Aaron M Secrest; Matthew Q Hand; Mark J Eliason
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2018-07-01

8.  Poison control center communication and impact on patient adherence.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Sonia Matwin; Srichand Jasti; Jacquee Williamson; Barbara Crouch; Martin Caravati; William Dudley
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.467

9.  Telephone consultations to manage paediatric outpatient clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a service evaluation.

Authors:  Lowri M Edwards; Mair Parry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  The game of telephone: a sustained, low-cost, quality improvement initiative to enhance communication between patients and their resident physician.

Authors:  Amanda Schnell; Sarah Stolte; Melissa Taylor; Jane Broxterman
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2017-09-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.