Literature DB >> 9753378

Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use.

E C Norton1, R C Lindrooth, S T Ennett.   

Abstract

This study examines whether the effects of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use are due to endogeneity of adolescents selecting their peer group. We analyzed data collected for a longitudinal analysis of a drug-use prevention programme for upper elementary school students. We used a two-step probit regression to control for the potentially endogenous explanatory variable peer substance use. Rigorous tests of endogeneity and the validity of the instrumental variables showed that controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use to reduce bias is not worth the reduction in mean squared error in these data. Peer substance use has a positive and significant effect on adolescent substance use for both drinking and smoking. These results imply that peer influence is empirically more important than peer selection (endogeneity) in our sample of adolescents in grades 6-9. Living in a single-parent family was by far the strongest predictor of adolescent drinking and smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9753378     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199808)7:5<439::aid-hec362>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  20 in total

1.  Peer effects in drug use and sex among college students.

Authors:  Greg J Duncan; Johanne Boisjoly; Michael Kremer; Dan M Levy; Jacque Eccles
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2005-06

2.  Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: results for 12-13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study.

Authors:  H de Vries; M Candel; R Engels; L Mercken
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The use of linear instrumental variables methods in health services research and health economics: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; W David Bradford; Clara E Dismuke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Mediation of Neighborhood Effects on Adolescent Substance Use by the School and Peer Environments.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Oleg Sofrygin; Nicole M Schmidt; Rebecca Crowder; M Maria Glymour; Jennifer Ahern; Theresa L Osypuk
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  The highs that bind: school context, social status and marijuana use.

Authors:  Matt Vogel; Chris E Rees; Timothy McCuddy; Dena C Carson
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-02-11

7.  Causal Spousal Health Spillover Effects and Implications for Program Evaluation.

Authors:  Jason Fletcher; Ryne Marksteiner
Journal:  Am Econ J Econ Policy       Date:  2017-11

8.  Modeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Erika L Moen; Julie P W Bynum; Andrea M Austin; Jonathan S Skinner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Taking the hassle out of wellness: Do peers and health matter?

Authors:  Shooshan Danagoulian
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-08-31

10.  Prenatal care demand and its effects on birth outcomes by birth defect status in Argentina.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Jeffrey C Murray; Eduardo E Castilla; Jorge S Lopez-Camelo; Robert L Ohsfeldt
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.