Literature DB >> 31925971

Modeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network.

A James O'Malley1,2, Erika L Moen1, Julie P W Bynum3, Andrea M Austin2, Jonathan S Skinner1,4.   

Abstract

We develop methodology that allows peer effects (also referred to as social influence and contagion) to be modified by the structural importance of the focal actor's position in the network. The methodology is first developed for a single peer effect and then extended to simultaneously model multiple peer-effects and their modifications by the structural importance of the focal actor. This work is motivated by the diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with congestive heart failure across a cardiovascular disease patient-sharing network of United States hospitals. We apply the general methodology to estimate peer effects for the adoption of capability to implant ICDs, the number of ICD implants performed by hospitals that are capable, and the number of patients referred to other hospitals by noncapable hospitals. Applying our novel methodology to study ICD diffusion across hospitals, we find evidence that exposure to ICD-capable peer hospitals is strongly associated with the chance a hospital becomes ICD-capable and that the direction and magnitude of the association is extensively modified by the strength of that hospital's position in the network, even after controlling for effects of geography. Therefore, interhospital networks, rather than geography per se, may explain key patterns of regional variations in healthcare utilization.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hierarchical model; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; longitudinal model; nationwide hospital network; peer effect; social network analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31925971      PMCID: PMC7450416          DOI: 10.1002/sim.8466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  26 in total

1.  Physician's peer exposure and the adoption of a new cancer treatment modality.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The Analysis of Social Networks.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Peter V Marsden
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2008-12-01

3.  Controlling for the endogeneity of peer substance use on adolescent alcohol and tobacco use.

Authors:  E C Norton; R C Lindrooth; S T Ennett
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The Network Autocorrelation Model using Two-mode Data: Affiliation Exposure and Potential Bias in the Autocorrelation Parameter.

Authors:  Kayo Fujimoto; Chih-Ping Chou; Thomas W Valente
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2011-07-01

5.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

6.  Expansion of invasive cardiac services in the United States.

Authors:  Jill R Horwitz; Austin Nichols; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Comilla Sasson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Assessing Variation in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy Guideline Adherence With Physician and Hospital Patient-sharing Networks.

Authors:  Erika L Moen; Julie P Bynum; Andrea M Austin; Jonathan S Skinner; Gouri Chakraborti; Alistair James O'Malley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Kim; Alison R Hwong; Derek Stafford; D Alex Hughes; A James O'Malley; James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long-term care facilities: important participants of the acute care facility social network?

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Yeohan Song; Sarah M Bartsch; Diane S Kim; Ashima Singh; Taliser R Avery; Shawn T Brown; S Levent Yilmaz; Kim F Wong; Margaret A Potter; Donald S Burke; Richard Platt; Susan S Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Estimating peer effects in longitudinal dyadic data using instrumental variables.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Felix Elwert; J Niels Rosenquist; Alan M Zaslavsky; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  The association of insurance plan characteristics with physician patient-sharing network structure.

Authors:  Kimberley H Geissler; Benjamin Lubin; Keith M Marzilli Ericson
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-02-26

2.  The impact of sampling patients on measuring physician patient-sharing networks using Medicare data.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Nancy L Keating; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.