Literature DB >> 19142690

Extended intralesional treatment versus resection of low-grade chondrosarcomas.

Chad Aarons1, Benjamin K Potter, Sheila C Adams, J David Pitcher, H Thomas Temple.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The need for segmental resection versus intralesional treatment of low-grade chondrosarcomas of the appendicular skeleton remains controversial. We hypothesized extended intralesional treatment would equally control malignant disease but with improved functional outcomes and decreased postoperative complications. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients with 32 Grade I intracompartmental chondrosarcomas of the long bones of the appendicular skeleton treated with either resection (15 lesions) or extended intralesional curetting (17) at a minimum followup of 2 years (median, 55 months; range, 24-203 months). Lesions were larger and median followup was longer in the resection cohort. One local recurrence developed in each treatment cohort and neither transitioned to a higher grade of tumor. No patient had metastases develop or died of disease. The mean final Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores were greater after extended intralesional versus resection treatment (29.5 versus 25.1). Complications were observed more frequently after resection and reconstruction (seven of 15) as compared with extended intralesional treatment (one of 17). Extended intralesional treatment of Grade I intracompartmental chondrosarcomas of the long bones of the appendicular skeleton therefore appears safe with improved functional scores and decreased complications versus segmental resection and reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19142690      PMCID: PMC2706338          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0691-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  43 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading.

Authors:  H L Evans; A G Ayala; M M Romsdahl
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The effect of cryosurgery and polymethylmethacrylate in dogs with experimental bone defects comparable to tumor defects.

Authors:  M M Malawer; M R Marks; D McChesney; M Piasio; S F Gunther; B M Schmookler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The use of cryosurgery in the treatment of low and medium grade chondrosarcoma. A preliminary report.

Authors:  R C Marcove; P B Stovell; A G Huvos; P G Bullough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Chondrosarcoma of bone: an oncological and functional follow-up study.

Authors:  J Bruns; M Elbracht; O Niggemeyer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM6) in low-grade chondrosarcoma: distinction from enchondroma and identification of progressive tumors.

Authors:  Andreas Helfenstein; Sven O Frahm; Matthias Krams; Wolf Drescher; Reza Parwaresch; Joachim Hassenpflug
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Hydrogen peroxide inhibits giant cell tumor and osteoblast metabolism in vitro.

Authors:  N C Nicholson; W K Ramp; J S Kneisl; K K Kaysinger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Recurrence of curetted and bone-grafted giant-cell tumours with and without adjuvant phenol therapy.

Authors:  K Trieb; P Bitzan; S Lang; M Dominkus; R Kotz
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 8.  Cryosurgery and acrylic cementation as surgical adjuncts in the treatment of aggressive (benign) bone tumors. Analysis of 25 patients below the age of 21.

Authors:  M M Malawer; W Dunham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

Authors:  M D Murphey; D J Flemming; S R Boyea; J A Bojescul; D E Sweet; H T Temple
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Does local recurrence impact survival in low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones?

Authors:  Joseph H Schwab; Doris Wenger; Krishnan Unni; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  19 in total

1.  Low-grade chondrosarcoma of bone: experiences from the Vienna Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry.

Authors:  Philipp T Funovics; Joannis Panotopoulos; Manuel Sabeti-Aschraf; Farshid Abdolvahab; Josef M Funovics; Susanna Lang; Rainer I Kotz; Martin Dominkus
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Risk factors for local recurrence from atypical cartilaginous tumour and enchondroma of the long bones.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Shinji Tsukamoto; Giovanni Ciani; Manabu Akahane; Luca Cevolani; Piergiuseppe Tanzi; Akira Kido; Kanya Honoki; Yasuhito Tanaka; Davide Maria Donati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-13

3.  Curettage and cryosurgery for low-grade cartilage tumors is associated with low recurrence and high function.

Authors:  David G Mohler; Richard Chiu; David A McCall; Raffi S Avedian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Intralesional treatment versus wide resection for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of the long bones.

Authors:  Edwin F Dierselhuis; Krista A Goulding; Martin Stevens; Paul C Jutte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 5.  Treatment strategies for central low-grade chondrosarcoma of long bones: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S S Shemesh; J D Acevedo-Nieves; J Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-10-06

6.  Estimated cause-specific survival continues to improve over time in patients with chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; Charles F Lynch; Joseph A Buckwalter; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Preoperative radiographic and histopathologic evaluation of central chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  Yasuo Yoshimura; Ken-ichi Isobe; Hideki Arai; Kaoru Aoki; Munehisa Kito; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A multiplanar complex resection of a low-grade chondrosarcoma of the distal femur guided by K-wires previously inserted under CT-guide: a case report.

Authors:  Carmine Zoccali; Barbara Rossi; Virginia Ferraresi; Vincenzo Anelli; Alessandro Rita
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Comparison of chondrosarcoma cases: current clinical situations among institutions.

Authors:  Sayed Abdulla Jami; Shi Jiandang; Liu Chang Hao; Zhu Xi; Yuan Wenqi; Zhanwen Zhou
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug

10.  Surgical treatment of central grade 1 chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton.

Authors:  Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Guido Scoccianti; Alessandro Franchi; Giuliana Roselli; Giovanni Beltrami; Massimiliano Ippolito; Giuseppe Caff; Filippo Frenos; Rodolfo Capanna
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.