BACKGROUND: Ninety per cent of the last year of life of cancer patients is spent at home. Some studies have suggested that care in this setting is often suboptimal. Information on the standard of palliative care delivered at home by general practitioners (GPs) and their teams is limited, and clarification of the problems faced is needed. AIM: To audit the home-based palliative care of patients dying of cancer. METHOD: Matched postal questionnaires were sent to the GPs and nurses of 1086 successive patients dying of cancer in whatever setting in the Grampian region of Scotland some six weeks after the death to establish the professionals' perception of symptom control, communication problems, use of services, and information given to patients and relatives. RESULTS: Response rates were 88.8% for GPs (964 out of 1086) and 87.1% for nurses (325 out of 375 that were passed on to nurses). Two-thirds of patients received palliative care at home. Pain was poorly controlled in 15.7%, and poor control of other symptoms ranged from 13.8% (nausea and vomiting) to 21% (depression and dyspnoea). Communication difficulties were present in 93.7% of cases, although only 5.2% of these were of a major nature. District nurses were involved in 76.7% of cases and Macmillan nurses in 28.0%. Twenty-six per cent of referrals to district nurses were assessed as being late in the course of the illness. Patients were fully informed about the diagnosis in 66.3% of cases and about the prognosis in 55.4%. General practitioners were more likely to report the presence of communication problems between themselves and the patient (when compared with nurses: 43.9% versus 28.0%), more likely to report that patients were 'not at all informed' about self-help groups (57.5% versus 36.3%), and were less likely to report the involvement of occupational therapists (21.8% versus 39.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of reporting of poor symptom control by professionals was much lower than levels reported by relatives in other studies, but there was no difference between the reporting of GPs and nurses. However, a number of areas were identified where care could be enhanced by improved teamwork and further education and training in symptom control, as well as in communication, use of services, and information provision.
BACKGROUND: Ninety per cent of the last year of life of cancerpatients is spent at home. Some studies have suggested that care in this setting is often suboptimal. Information on the standard of palliative care delivered at home by general practitioners (GPs) and their teams is limited, and clarification of the problems faced is needed. AIM: To audit the home-based palliative care of patients dying of cancer. METHOD: Matched postal questionnaires were sent to the GPs and nurses of 1086 successive patients dying of cancer in whatever setting in the Grampian region of Scotland some six weeks after the death to establish the professionals' perception of symptom control, communication problems, use of services, and information given to patients and relatives. RESULTS: Response rates were 88.8% for GPs (964 out of 1086) and 87.1% for nurses (325 out of 375 that were passed on to nurses). Two-thirds of patients received palliative care at home. Pain was poorly controlled in 15.7%, and poor control of other symptoms ranged from 13.8% (nausea and vomiting) to 21% (depression and dyspnoea). Communication difficulties were present in 93.7% of cases, although only 5.2% of these were of a major nature. District nurses were involved in 76.7% of cases and Macmillan nurses in 28.0%. Twenty-six per cent of referrals to district nurses were assessed as being late in the course of the illness. Patients were fully informed about the diagnosis in 66.3% of cases and about the prognosis in 55.4%. General practitioners were more likely to report the presence of communication problems between themselves and the patient (when compared with nurses: 43.9% versus 28.0%), more likely to report that patients were 'not at all informed' about self-help groups (57.5% versus 36.3%), and were less likely to report the involvement of occupational therapists (21.8% versus 39.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Levels of reporting of poor symptom control by professionals was much lower than levels reported by relatives in other studies, but there was no difference between the reporting of GPs and nurses. However, a number of areas were identified where care could be enhanced by improved teamwork and further education and training in symptom control, as well as in communication, use of services, and information provision.
Authors: Gail Ewing; Margaret Rogers; Stephen Barclay; Janet McCabe; Anna Martin; Malcolm Campbell; Chris Todd Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.386