Literature DB >> 9747504

The role of neural and optical factors in limiting visual resolution in myopia.

N C Strang1, B Winn, A Bradley.   

Abstract

The myopic growth process has the potential to modify both the optical and neural performance of the eye. We provide three simple models, based on different types of retinal stretching, to predict changes in neural resolution resulting from axial length increases in myopia. These predictions are compared to visual acuity (VA) measures in 34 subjects with refractive errors ranging from plano to -14 D. Our results show a reduction in VA with increasing myopia but not in a manner predicted by our models. We discuss the relative contribution of optical and neural factors to the reduction in visual resolution in myopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9747504     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00303-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

Review 1.  Practical applications to modify and control the development of ametropia.

Authors:  P R Sankaridurg; B A Holden
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  The relationship between peripapillary crescent and axial length: Implications for differential eye growth.

Authors:  Toco Y P Chui; Zhangyi Zhong; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Lan Chi Nguyen; Han Cheng; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length.

Authors:  Kaccie Y Li; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.925

8.  Is visual resolution after adaptive optics correction susceptible to perceptual learning?

Authors:  Ethan A Rossi; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.004

9.  Axial length and cone density as assessed with adaptive optics in myopia.

Authors:  Supriya Dabir; Shwetha Mangalesh; Jan S A G Schouten; Tos T J M Berendschot; Mathew Kummelil Kurian; Anupama Kiran Kumar; Naresh K Yadav; Rohit Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Altered spatial summation optimizes visual function in axial myopia.

Authors:  Victoria Stapley; Roger S Anderson; Kathryn J Saunders; Pádraig J Mulholland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.