BACKGROUND: The treatment of cholecystolithiasis has changed fundamentally in recent years due to the development of non-surgical techniques (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL], oral litholysis) and the implementation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of 2270 patients (1649 women, 621 men; age: 47.2 +/- 14 years) presenting with gallstone disorders in a university medical outpatients department between 1988 and 1992 in order to be instructed as to the most suitable therapy method bear witness to the rapid change in therapeutic procedure. Laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder has virtually supplanted conventional cholecystectomy, and within 5 years the proportionate role of ESWL has declined from 21 to 12%. Over the years, the proportion of patients requiring no therapeutic intervention remained constant (at about 20%). The therapeutic recommendations of the "experts" were implemented in almost 80% of cases. The majority of patients were satisfied with the chosen therapeutic approach (surgery: 93.0%, ESWL: 77.6%), although 44% of ESWL-patients and 36% of surgically managed patients reported complaints which persisted even after completion of therapy. Despite unsuccessful ESWL (residual fragments or recurrent stones) 58/95 (61%) of interviewed patients would again give preference to this non-invasive modality in the event of a renewed therapeutic decision. CONCLUSION: Only a few years after its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has asserted itself as the predominant treatment option. But as far as acceptance and preference by the patient are concerned extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy--as a non-invasive treatment modality--also enjoys high popularity and can be recommended as an alternative to surgery in suitable patients chosen according to the currently established stringent selection criteria.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of cholecystolithiasis has changed fundamentally in recent years due to the development of non-surgical techniques (extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy [ESWL], oral litholysis) and the implementation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis of 2270 patients (1649 women, 621 men; age: 47.2 +/- 14 years) presenting with gallstone disorders in a university medical outpatients department between 1988 and 1992 in order to be instructed as to the most suitable therapy method bear witness to the rapid change in therapeutic procedure. Laparoscopic removal of the gallbladder has virtually supplanted conventional cholecystectomy, and within 5 years the proportionate role of ESWL has declined from 21 to 12%. Over the years, the proportion of patients requiring no therapeutic intervention remained constant (at about 20%). The therapeutic recommendations of the "experts" were implemented in almost 80% of cases. The majority of patients were satisfied with the chosen therapeutic approach (surgery: 93.0%, ESWL: 77.6%), although 44% of ESWL-patients and 36% of surgically managed patients reported complaints which persisted even after completion of therapy. Despite unsuccessful ESWL (residual fragments or recurrent stones) 58/95 (61%) of interviewed patients would again give preference to this non-invasive modality in the event of a renewed therapeutic decision. CONCLUSION: Only a few years after its introduction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has asserted itself as the predominant treatment option. But as far as acceptance and preference by the patient are concerned extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy--as a non-invasive treatment modality--also enjoys high popularity and can be recommended as an alternative to surgery in suitable patients chosen according to the currently established stringent selection criteria.
Authors: J L Thistle; G R May; C E Bender; H J Williams; A J LeRoy; P E Nelson; C J Peine; B T Petersen; J E McCullough Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1989-03-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Sackmann; M Delius; T Sauerbruch; J Holl; W Weber; E Ippisch; U Hagelauer; O Wess; W Hepp; W Brendel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-02-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Ell; H T Schneider; J Benninger; S Theobaldy; N Friedel; W Rödl; P Wirtz; E G Hahn Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1991-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: H T Schneider; C Ell; J Benninger; S Theobaldy; N Friedel; W Rödl; N Heyder; E G Hahn Journal: Dtsch Med Wochenschr Date: 1991-01-25 Impact factor: 0.628