Literature DB >> 1936811

Significance of computed tomography for shock-wave therapy of radiolucent gallbladder stones.

C Ell1, H T Schneider, J Benninger, S Theobaldy, N Friedel, W Rödl, P Wirtz, E G Hahn.   

Abstract

One hundred eleven symptomatic patients (91 women, 20 men) with solitary "radiolucent" stones (proved by a plain radiograph) underwent examination with computed tomography for stone analysis before extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy with a second-generation piezoelectric lithoptripter. The aim of the study was to assess the importance of computed tomography as a diagnostic pretreatment procedure compared with the plain abdominal radiograph: computed tomography density values greater than 50 Hounsfield units (HU) were found in 64 of 111 patients with radiolucent stones (58%). Of these 64, 50 patients even had values greater than 90 HU (50/111;45%). The majority of the stones with density values greater than 50 HU had a hyperdense rim (43 of 64) with a mean maximum attenuation of 134 +/- 68 HU. A significantly higher degree of stone disintegration was achieved with stones of group A (less than or equal to 50 HU) than with those in group B (greater than 50 HU and less than or equal to 90 HU) and group C (greater than 90 HU) with respect to the mean maximum fragment size after the first (P less than 0.001) and last (P less than 0.01) lithotripsy and with respect to the total number of shock waves applied (P less than 0.001) and the number of treatments (P less than 0.001). No difference was observed between groups B and C. After all follow-up periods, the rate of complete stone disappearance was higher in group A than in group B (NS for 1, 2, and 4 months of follow-up; P less than 0.01 for month 8; P less than 0.05 for month 12) and group C (P less than 0.05 for 1, 2, and 4 months of follow-up; P less than 0.001 for months 8 and 12). The authors conclude that computed tomographic analysis of gallstones before lithotripsy is more sensitive in detecting nonradiolucent stones than in the plain radiograph. Computed tomographic stone analysis seems to provide a better selection of patients suitable for biliary lithotripsy and could become a standard diagnostic pretreatment procedure to improve stone disintegration and complete stone disappearance after shock-wave lithotripsy and adjuvant chemolitholysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936811     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90095-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  9 in total

1.  Effect of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy on gallbladder emptying in patients with solitary and multiple gallbladder stones.

Authors:  W Kratzer; R A Mason; U Haag; C Maier; P Janowitz; K Beckh; G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Gallstone dissolution with oral bile acid therapy. Importance of pretreatment CT scanning and reasons for nonresponse.

Authors:  S P Pereira; M J Veysey; C Kennedy; S H Hussaini; G M Murphy; R H Dowling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  Transhepatic topical dissolution of gallbladder stones with MTBE and EDTA. Results, side effects, and correlation with CT imaging.

Authors:  P Janowitz; K A Schumacher; W Swobodnik; W Kratzer; J Tudyka; J G Wechsler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Biliary lithotripsy with a new electromagnetic shock wave source. A 2-year clinical experience.

Authors:  T Wehrmann; A Hurst; B Lembcke; M Jung; W Caspary
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pulverisation of calcified and non-calcified gall bladder stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy used alone.

Authors:  N Soehendra; V C Nam; K F Binmoeller; H Koch; S Bohnacker; H W Schreiber
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Symptomatic gallbladder stones. Cost-effectiveness of treatment with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, conventional and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P M Go; M F Stolk; H Obertop; C Dirksen; D H van der Elst; A Ament; K J van Erpecum; G P van Berge Henegouwen; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [Changes in and acceptance of surgical and noninvasive therapy procedures in cholecystolithiasis].

Authors:  H T Schneider; E Schell; F Wenzel; J Benninger; T Rabenstein; H Flügel; A Katalinic; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-08-15

9.  Gallbladder stone recurrence after medical treatment. Do gallstones recur true to type?

Authors:  S P Pereira; S H Hussaini; C Kennedy; R H Dowling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.