Literature DB >> 9746770

The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties.

D Grimwade1, H Walker, F Oliver, K Wheatley, C Harrison, G Harrison, J Rees, I Hann, R Stevens, A Burnett, A Goldstone.   

Abstract

Cytogenetics is considered one of the most valuable prognostic determinants in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, many studies on which this assertion is based were limited by relatively small sample sizes or varying treatment approach, leading to conflicting data regarding the prognostic implications of specific cytogenetic abnormalities. The Medical Research Council (MRC) AML 10 trial, which included children and adults up to 55 years of age, not only affords the opportunity to determine the independent prognostic significance of pretreatment cytogenetics in the context of large patient groups receiving comparable therapy, but also to address their impact on the outcome of subsequent transplantation procedures performed in first complete remission (CR). On the basis of response to induction treatment, relapse risk, and overall survival, three prognostic groups could be defined by cytogenetic abnormalities detected at presentation in comparison with the outcome of patients with normal karyotype. AML associated with t(8;21), t(15;17) or inv(16) predicted a relatively favorable outcome. Whereas in patients lacking these favorable changes, the presence of a complex karyotype, -5, del(5q), -7, or abnormalities of 3q defined a group with relatively poor prognosis. The remaining group of patients including those with 11q23 abnormalities, +8, +21, +22, del(9q), del(7q) or other miscellaneous structural or numerical defects not encompassed by the favorable or adverse risk groups were found to have an intermediate prognosis. The presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities did not modify the outcome of patients with favorable cytogenetics. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the three cytogenetically defined prognostic groups retained their predictive value in the context of secondary as well as de novo AML, within the pediatric age group and furthermore were found to be a key determinant of outcome from autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in first CR. This study highlights the importance of diagnostic cytogenetics as an independent prognostic factor in AML, providing the framework for a stratified treatment approach of this disease, which has been adopted in the current MRC AML 12 trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9746770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  518 in total

1.  Erythroleukaemia in the north of England: a population based study.

Authors:  A W Wells; N Bown; M M Reid; P J Hamilton; G H Jackson; P R Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparable survival after HLA-well-matched unrelated or matched sibling donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission with unfavorable cytogenetics at diagnosis.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Martin S Tallman; Wensheng He; Brent R Logan; Edward Copelan; Robert Peter Gale; Hanna J Khoury; Thomas Klumpp; John Koreth; Hillard M Lazarus; David I Marks; Rodrigo Martino; David A Rizzieri; Jacob M Rowe; Mitchell Sabloff; Edmund K Waller; John F DiPersio; Donald W Bunjes; Daniel J Weisdorf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  When Glycosylation Meets Blood Cells: A Glance of the Aberrant Glycosylation in Hematological Malignancies.

Authors:  Huining Su; Mimi Wang; Xingchen Pang; Feng Guan; Xiang Li; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 5.545

4.  Report of a phase II study of clofarabine and cytarabine in de novo and relapsed and refractory AML patients and in selected elderly patients at high risk for anthracycline toxicity.

Authors:  Edward Agura; Barry Cooper; Houston Holmes; Estil Vance; Robert Brian Berryman; Christopher Maisel; Sandy Li; Giovanna Saracino; Mirjana Tadic-Ovcina; Joseph Fay
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-27

Review 5.  Pathogenesis and consequences of uniparental disomy in cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia: Current state in 2013 and future directions.

Authors:  Abraham S Kanate; Marcelo C Pasquini; Parameswaran N Hari; Mehdi Hamadani
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 8.  Beyond genetics--the emerging role of epigenetic changes in hematopoietic malignancies.

Authors:  Oliver Galm; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  The influence of mutational status and biological characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia on xenotransplantation outcomes in NOD SCID gamma mice.

Authors:  Martin Culen; Zdenka Kosarova; Ivana Jeziskova; Adam Folta; Jana Chovancova; Tomas Loja; Nikola Tom; Vojtech Bystry; Veronika Janeckova; Dana Dvorakova; Jiri Mayer; Zdenek Racil
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Richard Stone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.