Literature DB >> 9746129

Influence of head-to-trunk position on sound lateralization.

J Lewald1, W H Ehrenstein.   

Abstract

The effect of horizontal head position on the lateralization of dichotic sound stimuli was investigated in four experiments. In experiment 1, subjects adjusted the interaural level difference (ILD) of a stimulus (band-pass noise) to the subjective auditory median plane (SAMP) while simultaneously directing the beam of a laser attached to the head to visual targets in various directions. The adjustments were significantly correlated with head position, shifting in a direction toward the side to which the head was turned. This result was replicated in experiment 2, which employed a two-alternative forced-choice method, in which stimuli of different ILD were presented and left/right judgments were made. In both experiments, the average magnitude of the shift of the SAMP was about 1 dB over the range of head positions from straight ahead to 60 degrees to the side. The shift of the SAMP indicates that any shift in head position induces a change in sound lateralization in the opposite direction, i.e., the intracranial sound image is shifted slightly to the left when the head is directed to the right and to the right when the head is to the left. In experiments 3 and 4, the effect of head position was compared with that of eye position by using the same methods as in experiment 2. Both shifts in SAMP, induced by either head- or eye-position changes, are in the same direction and, on average, of about the same magnitude (experiment 3), and head- and eye-position effects compensate approximately for each other during variations of head position when the gaze remains fixed to a visual target in space (experiment 4).

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9746129     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Touch used to guide action is partially coded in a visual reference frame.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceived touch location is coded using a gaze signal.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory and visual orienting responses in listeners with and without hearing-impairment.

Authors:  W Owen Brimijoin; David McShefferty; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action.

Authors:  Brigitte Röder; Anna Kusmierek; Charles Spence; Tobias Schicke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The plastic ear and perceptual relearning in auditory spatial perception.

Authors:  Simon Carlile
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Eye-movements intervening between two successive sounds disrupt comparisons of auditory location.

Authors:  Francesco Pavani; Masud Husain; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Probing the time course of head-motion cues integration during auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Hirohito M Kondo; Iwaki Toshima; Daniel Pressnitzer; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.