Literature DB >> 18566808

Eye-movements intervening between two successive sounds disrupt comparisons of auditory location.

Francesco Pavani1, Masud Husain, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Many studies have investigated how saccades may affect the internal representation of visual locations across eye-movements. Here, we studied, instead, whether eye-movements can affect auditory spatial cognition. In two experiments, participants judged the relative azimuth (same/different) of two successive sounds presented from a horizontal array of loudspeakers, separated by a 2.5-s delay. Eye-position was either held constant throughout the trial (being directed in a fixed manner to the far left or right of the loudspeaker array) or had to be shifted to the opposite side of the array during the retention delay between the two sounds, after the first sound but before the second. Loudspeakers were either visible (Experiment 1) or occluded from sight (Experiment 2). In both cases, shifting eye-position during the silent delay-period affected auditory performance in thn the successive auditory comparison task, even though the auditory inputs to be judged were equivalent. Sensitivity (d') for the auditory discrimination was disrupted, specifically when the second sound shifted in the opposite direction to the intervening eye-movement with respect to the first sound. These results indicate that eye-movements affect internal representation of auditory location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18566808      PMCID: PMC2628747          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1440-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  Sound localization with eccentric head position.

Authors:  J Lewald; G J Dörrscheidt; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual and proprioceptive shifts in perceived egocentric direction induced by eye-position.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Eye position-related activity in deep neck muscles of the alert cat.

Authors:  P P Vidal; A Roucoux; A Berthoz; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1983

Review 5.  Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades.

Authors:  J Ross; M C Morrone; M E Goldberg; D C Burr
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Predictive remapping of visual features precedes saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  David Melcher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Influence of head-to-trunk position on sound lateralization.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of eye position on auditory lateralization.

Authors:  J Lewald; W H Ehrenstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses.

Authors:  M M Umeno; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Sensorimotor integration in the primate superior colliculus. II. Coordinates of auditory signals.

Authors:  M F Jay; D L Sparks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  4 in total

1.  Saccades create similar mislocalizations in visual and auditory space.

Authors:  Hannah M Krüger; Thérèse Collins; Bernhard Englitz; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Benefits of active listening during 3D sound localization.

Authors:  V Gaveau; A Coudert; R Salemme; E Koun; C Desoche; E Truy; A Farnè; F Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Sounds are remapped across saccades.

Authors:  Martin Szinte; David Aagten-Murphy; Donatas Jonikaitis; Luca Wollenberg; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Eye Movements during Auditory Attention Predict Individual Differences in Dorsal Attention Network Activity.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Braga; Richard Z Fu; Barry M Seemungal; Richard J S Wise; Robert Leech
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.