Literature DB >> 9745966

General characteristics and suppression tuning properties of the distortion-product otoacoustic emission 2f1-f2 in the barn owl.

G Taschenberger1, G A Manley.   

Abstract

The distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) 2f1-f2 was measured in the ear canal of the barn owl. DPOAE were elicited by primary tones in 11 frequency regions from 1 to 9 kHz. The highest DPOAE output levels and best thresholds were found for f1 frequencies of 4 to 7 kHz and additionally at the lowest f1 frequency investigated. In some cases, the DPOAE sound pressures were only 37 dB below the primary-tone levels (PTL). The optimal primary-tone frequency ratios ranged from 1.05 to 1.45 and varied strongly among the different frequency regions investigated. The largest optimal ratios were measured in the middle frequency range for f1. At lower and higher f1, the optimal ratios decreased. DPOAE levels could be suppressed in a frequency-selective way by adding a third tone. As in other non-mammals, the best suppressive frequencies were near f1, suggesting DPOAE generation near the frequency place of this primary tone. This is in contrast to what is known for mammalian species, where the DPOAE is thought to be generated near f2. To obtain 6 dB of suppression of the DPOAE level, suppressor-tone levels ranging from 13 dB below to 4 dB above the primary-tone level were necessary. The Q10dB-values of suppression tuning curves increased as a function of frequency up to a value of 15.8. This tendency resembled the increase in frequency selectivity of auditory nerve fibers in this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745966     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(98)00120-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Multifrequency forcing of a Hopf oscillator model of the inner ear.

Authors:  K A Montgomery
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Otoacoustic Emissions in Non-Mammals.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-05-11

5.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): parameter optimization.

Authors:  M D Valero; E G Pasanen; D McFadden; R Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Influence of ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia on cubic and quadratic high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D Schlenther; C Voss; M Kössl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.