Literature DB >> 9745057

Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study.

T J Heikkinen1, K Haukipuro, A Hulkko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA).
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients were randomized to either the LA (n = 19) or OA (n = 21) group.
RESULTS: The medians of operative times in the LA and OA groups were 31.5 and 41 min, respectively. The total operation room times were 91 and 82 min, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain or fatigue, but return to normal life was faster in the LA group (14 versus 26. 5 days). The median hospital costs per patient were 8,538 and 6,788 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) in the LA and OA groups, respectively; but the total costs among working patients were lower in the LA group (20, 963 versus 27,778 FIM) due to faster return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe as open appendectomy. The hospital costs are higher, but LA offers significant cost savings to the payer for working patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745057     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omer Aziz; Thanos Athanasiou; Paris P Tekkis; Sanjay Purkayastha; James Haddow; Vitali Malinovski; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a critical review.

Authors:  M Kapischke; A Caliebe; J Tepel; T Schulz; J Hedderich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Munir Ahmad Khan; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza Khurrum Baig
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  [Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].

Authors:  M N Wente; H Waleczek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  [Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost?].

Authors:  C Holmer; H J Buhr; J-P Ritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Cost efficacy of laparoscopic vs open surgery. Hospitals vs community.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaohang Li; Jialin Zhang; Lixuan Sang; Wenliang Zhang; Zhiqiang Chu; Xin Li; Yongfeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.