Literature DB >> 9745056

A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study.

T J Heikkinen1, K Haukipuro, A Hulkko.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs.
METHODS: To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit.
RESULTS: Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower.
CONCLUSION: Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9745056     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Cost containment and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  L P Farinas; F D Griffen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Primary inguinal hernia repair: open or laparoscopic, that is the question. Point.

Authors:  J D Mellinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Economic evaluation of laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphies: the effect of cost-containment measures and internal hospital policy decisions on costs and charges.

Authors:  Y S Khajanchee; T A G Kenyon; P D Hansen; L L Swanström
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review.

Authors:  M Gholghesaei; H R Langeveld; R Veldkamp; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Day case laparoscopic herniorraphy. A NICE procedure with a long learning curve.

Authors:  M Lim; C J O'Boyle; C M S Royston; P C Sedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Cost efficacy of laparoscopic vs open surgery. Hospitals vs community.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C G Schmedt; S Sauerland; R Bittner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017patients.

Authors:  S A Kapiris; W A Brough; C M Royston; C O'Boyle; P C Sedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of mesh-plug and Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J Li; Z Ji; Y Li
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Omer Bender; Fatih Levent Balcı; Enis Yüney; Fazıl Sağlam; Yaşar Ozdenkaya; Yavuz Selim Sarı
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.