Literature DB >> 9744949

Dependence on target configuration of express saccade-related activity in the primate superior colliculus.

J A Edelman1, E L Keller.   

Abstract

To help understand how complex visual stimuli are processed into short-latency saccade motor programs, the activity of visuomotor neurons in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus was recorded while two monkeys made express saccades to one target and to two targets. It has been shown previously that the visual response and perimotor discharge characteristic of visuomotor neurons temporally coalesce into a single burst of discharge for express saccades. Here we seek to determine whether the distributed visual response to two targets spatially coalesces into a command appropriate for the resulting saccade. Two targets were presented at identical radial eccentricities separated in direction by 45 degrees. A gap paradigm was used to elicit express saccades. Express saccades were more likely to land in between the two targets than were saccades of longer latency. The speeds of express saccades to two targets were similar to those of one target of similar vector, as were the trajectories of saccades to one and two targets. The movement fields for express saccades to two targets were more broad than those for saccades to one target for all neurons studied. For most neurons, the spatial pattern of discharge for saccades to two targets was better explained as a scaled version of the visual response to two spatially separate targets than as a scaled version of the perimotor response accompanying a saccade to a single target. Only the discharge of neurons with large movement fields could be equally well explained as a visual response to two targets or as a perimotor response for a one-target saccade. For most neurons, the spatial properties of discharge depended on the number of targets throughout the entire saccade-related burst. These results suggest that for express saccades to two targets the computation of saccade vector is not complete at the level of the superior colliculus for most neurons and an explicit process of target selection is not necessary at this level for the programming of an express saccade.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744949     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  Superior colliculus inactivation alters the weighted integration of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A test of spatial temporal decoding mechanisms in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; A J Van Opstal; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Updating of an occluded moving target for interceptive saccades.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Competitive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming.

Authors:  Michael C Dorris; Etienne Olivier; Doug P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Circuits for Action and Cognition: A View from the Superior Colliculus.

Authors:  Michele A Basso; Paul J May
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.422

6.  Order of operations for decoding superior colliculus activity for saccade generation.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cues to move increased information in superior colliculus tuning curves.

Authors:  Xiaobing Li; Michele A Basso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Linking express saccade occurance to stimulus properties and sensorimotor integration in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Ron Levy; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Activity of primate V1 neurons during the gap saccade task.

Authors:  Kayeon Kim; Choongkil Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.