Literature DB >> 9744499

Estimations of intra- and extracellular volume and pH by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy: effect of therapy on RIF-1 tumours.

Z M Bhujwalla1, C L McCoy, J D Glickson, R J Gillies, M Stubbs.   

Abstract

Quantification of metabolite or drug concentrations in living tissues requires determination of intra- and extracellular volumes. This study demonstrates how this can be achieved non-invasively by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) employing dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) as a marker of total water space, 3-aminopropylphosphonate (3-APP) as a marker of extracellular space and P and 3-APP as markers of intracellular pH (pH) and extracellular pH (pHe) respectively. The MRS measurements of the tumour volumes were validated by classic radiolabelling methods using 3H2O and [14C]inulin as markers of total and extracellular space respectively. The extracellular volume fraction measured by radiolabelling of RIF-1 tumours was 23 +/- 0.83% (mean +/- s.e.m. n = 9), not significantly different (P > 0.1) from that found by MRS (27 +/- 2.9%, n = 9, London, and 35 +/- 6.7, n = 14, Baltimore). In untreated RIF-1 tumours, pH was about 0.2 units higher than pHe (P < 0.01). 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment (165 mg kg(-1)) caused no significant changes in either pHe or per cent extracellular volume. However significant increases in pH, 48 h after treatment (P < 0.01) correlated with decreased tumour size and improved bioenergetic status [NTP/inorganic phosphate (Pi) ratio]. This study shows the feasibility of an MR method (verified by a 'gold standard') for studying the effects of drug treatment on intra- and extracellular spaces and pH in solid tumours in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744499      PMCID: PMC2063062          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  15 in total

1.  1H NMR spectroscopy of subcutaneous tumors in mice: preliminary studies of effects of growth, chemotherapy and blood flow reduction.

Authors:  D C Shungu; Z M Bhujwalla; J P Wehrle; J D Glickson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Intracellular pH and the control of multidrug resistance.

Authors:  S Simon; D Roy; M Schindler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energy metabolism, pH changes, and lactate production in RIF-1 tumors following intratumoral injection of glucose.

Authors:  Z M Bhujwalla; I Constantinidis; J C Chatham; J P Wehrle; J D Glickson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and blood perfusion of the RIF-1 tumor following X-irradiation.

Authors:  G M Tozer; Z M Bhujwalla; J R Griffiths; R J Maxwell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tumor cell sensitivity to hyperthermia as a function of extracellular and intracellular pH.

Authors:  K G Hofer; N F Mivechi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP): a 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic probe of intracellular volume in mammalian cell cultures.

Authors:  J A Barry; K A McGovern; Y H Lien; B Ashmore; R J Gillies
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-05-04       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Tumor bioenergetics and blood flow in RIF-1 murine tumors treated with 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  S J Li; J P Wehrle; J D Glickson; N Kumar; P G Braunschweiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  31P nuclear magnetic resonance evidence for the regulation of intracellular pH by Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

Authors:  R J Gillies; T Ogino; R G Shulman; D C Ward
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Determination of absolute phosphate metabolite concentrations in RIF-1 tumors in vivo by 31P-1H-2H NMR spectroscopy using water as an internal intensity reference.

Authors:  D C Shungu; Z M Bhujwalla; S J Li; L M Rose; J P Wehrle; J D Glickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  An assessment of 31P MRS as a method of measuring pH in rat tumours.

Authors:  M Stubbs; Z M Bhujwalla; G M Tozer; L M Rodrigues; R J Maxwell; R Morgan; F A Howe; J R Griffiths
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: tumor biology and physiology.

Authors:  R J Gillies; Z M Bhujwalla; J Evelhoch; M Garwood; M Neeman; S P Robinson; C H Sotak; B Van Der Sanden
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Cancer nanomedicines targeting tumor extracellular pH.

Authors:  Li Tian; You Han Bae
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 5.268

3.  ³¹P-MRS studies of melanoma xenografts with different metastatic potential.

Authors:  Lin Z Li; Rong Zhou; Dennis B Leeper; Jerry D Glickson
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  pH-titratable superparamagnetic iron oxide for improved nanoparticle accumulation in acidic tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Samuel H Crayton; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Evaluating pH in the Extracellular Tumor Microenvironment Using CEST MRI and Other Imaging Methods.

Authors:  Liu Qi Chen; Mark D Pagel
Journal:  Adv Radiol       Date:  2015

6.  Lanthanide ion (III) complexes of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraaminophosphonate for dual biosensing of pH with chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and biosensor imaging of redundant deviation in shifts (BIRDS).

Authors:  Yuegao Huang; Daniel Coman; Meser M Ali; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Gd-labeled glycol chitosan as a pH-responsive magnetic resonance imaging agent for detecting acidic tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Kido Nwe; Ching-Hui Huang; Andrew Tsourkas
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Pilot study of Iopamidol-based quantitative pH imaging on a clinical 3T MR scanner.

Authors:  Anja Müller-Lutz; Nadia Khalil; Benjamin Schmitt; Vladimir Jellus; Gael Pentang; Georg Oeltzschner; Gerald Antoch; Rotem S Lanzman; Hans-Jörg Wittsack
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Application of Good's buffers to pH imaging using hyperpolarized (13)C MRI.

Authors:  Robert R Flavell; Cornelius von Morze; Joseph E Blecha; David E Korenchan; Mark Van Criekinge; Renuka Sriram; Jeremy W Gordon; Hsin-Yu Chen; Sukumar Subramaniam; Robert A Bok; Zhen J Wang; Daniel B Vigneron; Peder E Larson; John Kurhanewicz; David M Wilson
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Arterial input functions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: which model performs best when assessing breast cancer response?

Authors:  David K Woolf; N Jane Taylor; Andreas Makris; Nina Tunariu; David J Collins; Sonia P Li; Mei-Lin Ah-See; Mark Beresford; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.