Literature DB >> 9744440

Extensive variation in the signal amplitude of the atrial floating VDD pacing electrode.

Z H Sun1, J Stjernvall, P Laine, L Toivonen.   

Abstract

The dependence of atrial signal amplitude on the site of the atrial sensing dipole of a single-pass lead was examined in 29 patients. The vertical location of the dipole was documented in supine fluoroscopy during quiescent and deep breathing and in upright chest roentgenogram, and was expressed as a proportion of the right atrial height. As the group average, the atrial signal amplitude was equal when tested in supine, sitting, standing, and right- or left-side positions in follow-up determinations. The signal amplitude varied markedly between postures, showing a coefficient of variation of 45% +/- 24% within the group. Coefficient of variation within the 6-month follow-up period in each tested position ranged from 31%-44%. Correlation between postures was weak (range of r = 0.53-0.81). Vertical location of the atrial dipole had no relationship to the signal amplitude. At least in one posture or test occasion the atrial signal amplitude was very low, < or = 0.35 mV in 20 patients, and below detection limit (0.25 mV) in 5 patients. Programmed to high sensitivity, atrial undersensing was rare in ambulatory electrocardiography, ranging from 0-9,000 missed atrial beats (0%-8%), with a median of 100 beats/24 hours. In conclusion, temporary variation in atrial signal amplitude is extensive. Despite occasionally measured large signal amplitudes atrial sensitivity in single lead VDD pacemakers should be programmed high, and if poor atrial tracking is suspected, other methods besides routine sensitivity testing should be adapted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744440     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  Single lead catheter of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with floating atrial sensing dipole implanted via persistent left superior vena cava.

Authors:  Michele Malagù; Tiziano Toselli; Matteo Bertini
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-26

2.  The impact of the distance between the atrial electrode and the atrial wall on atrial undersensing in patients with VDD pacemakers: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Timucin Altin; Muharrem Guldal; Basar Candemir; Cegerhun Polat; Aydan O Ozdemir; Cansin Tulunay; Cagdas Ozdol; Omer Akyurek; Remzi Karaoguz; Cetin Erol
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Subclinical Atrial Tachyarrhythmias:Implantable Devices and Remote Monitoring.

Authors:  Elia De Maria; Daniele Giacopelli
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Long-term outcome in patients receiving permanent pacemaker implantation for atrioventricular block: Comparison of VDD and DDD pacing.

Authors:  Jo-Nan Liao; Tze-Fan Chao; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Chi-Woon Kong; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  The efficacy of the LinoxSmart DX ICD lead from a single center experience.

Authors:  Ibrahim Marai; Anat Milman; Rafael Diamante; Osnat Gurevitz; David Barlev; Igor Lipchenka; Eyal Nof; Michael Glikson; Roy Beinart
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2019-12-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.