PURPOSE: To theoretically derive and empirically validate the relationship between the actual thick intraocular lens and the thin lens equivalent. METHODS: Included in the study were 12 consecutive adult patients ranging in age from 54 to 84 years (mean +/- SD, 73.5 +/- 9.4 years) with best-corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 in each eye. Each patient had bilateral intraocular lens implants of the same style, placed in the same location (bag or sulcus) by the same surgeon. Preoperatively, axial length, keratometry, refraction, and vertex distance were measured. Postoperatively, keratometry, refraction, vertex distance, and the distance from the vertex of the cornea to the anterior vertex of the intraocular lens (AV(PC1)) were measured. Alternatively, the distance (AV(PC1)) was then back-calculated from the vergence formula used for intraocular lens power calculations. RESULTS: The average (+/-SD) of the absolute difference in the two methods was 0.23 +/- 0.18 mm, which would translate to approximately 0.46 diopters. There was no statistical difference between the measured and calculated values; the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient from linear regression was 0.85 (r2 = .72, F = 56). The average intereye difference was -0.030 mm (SD, 0.141 mm; SEM, 0.043 mm) using the measurement method and +0.124 mm (SD, 0.412 mm; SEM, 0.124 mm) using the calculation method. CONCLUSION: The relationship between the actual thick intraocular lens and the thin lens equivalent has been determined theoretically and demonstrated empirically. This validation provides the manufacturer and surgeon additional confidence and utility for lens constants used in intraocular lens power calculations.
PURPOSE: To theoretically derive and empirically validate the relationship between the actual thick intraocular lens and the thin lens equivalent. METHODS: Included in the study were 12 consecutive adult patients ranging in age from 54 to 84 years (mean +/- SD, 73.5 +/- 9.4 years) with best-corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 in each eye. Each patient had bilateral intraocular lens implants of the same style, placed in the same location (bag or sulcus) by the same surgeon. Preoperatively, axial length, keratometry, refraction, and vertex distance were measured. Postoperatively, keratometry, refraction, vertex distance, and the distance from the vertex of the cornea to the anterior vertex of the intraocular lens (AV(PC1)) were measured. Alternatively, the distance (AV(PC1)) was then back-calculated from the vergence formula used for intraocular lens power calculations. RESULTS: The average (+/-SD) of the absolute difference in the two methods was 0.23 +/- 0.18 mm, which would translate to approximately 0.46 diopters. There was no statistical difference between the measured and calculated values; the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient from linear regression was 0.85 (r2 = .72, F = 56). The average intereye difference was -0.030 mm (SD, 0.141 mm; SEM, 0.043 mm) using the measurement method and +0.124 mm (SD, 0.412 mm; SEM, 0.124 mm) using the calculation method. CONCLUSION: The relationship between the actual thick intraocular lens and the thin lens equivalent has been determined theoretically and demonstrated empirically. This validation provides the manufacturer and surgeon additional confidence and utility for lens constants used in intraocular lens power calculations.
Authors: Joaquín Fernández; Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo; Javier Martínez; Ana Tauste; David P Piñero Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 1.909