Literature DB >> 9744307

Prediction of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five histological classifications: a comparative study with long follow-up.

S Badve1, R P A'Hern, A M Ward, R R Millis, S E Pinder, I O Ellis, B A Gusterson, J P Sloane.   

Abstract

The increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by mammographic screening and the more widespread use of breast-conserving surgery have led to a search for histological features associated with the risk of recurrence. In a case control study of 141 patients with long follow-up, we compared the ability of five morphological classifications to predict recurrence after local excision. A significant correlation was not found between recurrence and growth pattern when a traditional classification based on architecture was used nor with necrosis when a scheme based principally on this feature was employed. A correlation was, however, found between recurrence and "differentiation" as defined by nuclear features and cell polarization in a classification recently formulated by the European Pathologists Working Group (EPWG), but this failed to reach statistical significance at the 5% level. A stronger and statistically significant correlation was found between nuclear grade as defined by the EPWG and recurrence when cell polarization was disregarded, using the classification currently employed by the UK National Health Service and European Commission-funded Breast Screening Programmes. This was attributable to a small number of recurring cases being downgraded as a consequence of exhibiting polarized cells. A significant correlation between histology and recurrence was also observed using the Van Nuys classification, which is based on nuclear grade and necrosis. Whether the tumor recurred as in situ or invasive carcinoma was unrelated to histological classification, as was the time course over which it occurred. These findings strongly support the use of nuclear grade to identify cases of DCIS at high risk of recurrence after local excision, but further work is necessary to determine whether nuclear grade or necrosis is more appropriate to subdivide the non-high-grade cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9744307     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(98)90196-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  17 in total

1.  Effect of margins of excision on recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; J Logan; J M Morgan; R Johnson; R Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from the Pathological Perspective.

Authors:  Pedro Oscar R Cunha; Mark Ornstein; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Impact of a national external quality assessment scheme for breast pathology in the UK.

Authors:  I O Ellis; D Coleman; C Wells; S Kodikara; E M Paish; S Moss; S Al-Sam; N Anderson; L Bobrow; I Buley; C E Connolly; N S Dallimore; S Hales; A Hanby; S Humphreys; F Knox; J Lowe; J Macartney; R Nash; D Parham; J Patnick; S E Pinder; C M Quinn; A J Robertson; J Shrimankar; R A Walker; R Winder
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ].

Authors:  A Lebeau
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019.

Authors:  Sunil S Badve; Yesim Gökmen-Polar
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 6.  Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Shi-Yi Wang; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

7.  Avoiding Pitfalls in the Statistical Analysis of Heterogeneous Tumors.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi Miller; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2009-01-01

8.  Heterogeneity Between Ducts of the Same Nuclear Grade Involved by Duct Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast.

Authors:  Naomi A Miller; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Jin Qian; William A Christens-Barry; Yuejiao Fu; Yan Yuan; H Lavina A Lickley; David E Axelrod
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2010-09-07

9.  A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin; Robert Gray; Frederick L Baehner; Steven M Butler; Lorie L Hughes; Carl Yoshizawa; Diana B Cherbavaz; Steven Shak; David L Page; George W Sledge; Nancy E Davidson; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; William C Wood; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil Badve
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Effect of quantitative nuclear image features on recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi A Miller; H Lavina Lickley; Jin Qian; William A Christens-Barry; Yan Yuan; Yuejiao Fu; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.